rust/library/proc_macro/src
Nika Layzell efda49712b proc_macro/bridge: use the cross-thread executor for nested proc-macros
While working on some other changes in the bridge, I noticed that when
running a nested proc-macro (which is currently only possible using
the unstable `TokenStream::expand_expr`), any symbols held by the
proc-macro client would be invalidated, as the same thread would be used
for the nested macro by default, and the interner doesn't handle nested
use.

After discussing with @eddyb, we decided the best approach might be to
force the use of the cross-thread executor for nested invocations, as it
will never re-use thread-local storage, avoiding the issue. This
shouldn't impact performance, as expand_expr is still unstable, and
infrequently used.

This was chosen rather than making the client symbol interner handle
nested invocations, as that would require replacing the internal
interner `Vec` with a `BTreeMap` (as valid symbol id ranges could now be
disjoint), and the symbol interner is known to be fairly perf-sensitive.

This patch adds checks to the execution strategy to use the cross-thread
executor when doing nested invocations. An alternative implementation
strategy could be to track this information in the `ExtCtxt`, however a
thread-local in the `proc_macro` crate was chosen to add an assertion so
that `rust-analyzer` is aware of the issue if it implements
`expand_expr` in the future.

r? @eddyb
2022-09-04 14:06:26 -04:00
..
bridge proc_macro/bridge: use the cross-thread executor for nested proc-macros 2022-09-04 14:06:26 -04:00
diagnostic.rs proc_macro/bridge: send diagnostics over the bridge as a struct 2022-08-06 15:49:43 -04:00
lib.rs Expose size_hint() for TokenStream's iterator 2022-07-24 20:36:22 -07:00
quote.rs Remove unused macro rules 2022-04-18 23:28:06 +02:00