190 lines
6 KiB
Rust
190 lines
6 KiB
Rust
use clippy_config::Conf;
|
|
use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
|
|
use clippy_utils::fulfill_or_allowed;
|
|
use clippy_utils::source::snippet;
|
|
use rustc_data_structures::fx::FxHashMap;
|
|
use rustc_errors::Applicability;
|
|
use rustc_hir::{self as hir, ExprKind};
|
|
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
|
|
use rustc_session::impl_lint_pass;
|
|
use rustc_span::Span;
|
|
use rustc_span::symbol::Symbol;
|
|
|
|
declare_clippy_lint! {
|
|
/// ### What it does
|
|
/// Checks for struct constructors where the order of the field
|
|
/// init in the constructor is inconsistent with the order in the
|
|
/// struct definition.
|
|
///
|
|
/// ### Why is this bad?
|
|
/// Since the order of fields in a constructor doesn't affect the
|
|
/// resulted instance as the below example indicates,
|
|
///
|
|
/// ```no_run
|
|
/// #[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
|
|
/// struct Foo {
|
|
/// x: i32,
|
|
/// y: i32,
|
|
/// }
|
|
/// let x = 1;
|
|
/// let y = 2;
|
|
///
|
|
/// // This assertion never fails:
|
|
/// assert_eq!(Foo { x, y }, Foo { y, x });
|
|
/// ```
|
|
///
|
|
/// inconsistent order can be confusing and decreases readability and consistency.
|
|
///
|
|
/// ### Example
|
|
/// ```no_run
|
|
/// struct Foo {
|
|
/// x: i32,
|
|
/// y: i32,
|
|
/// }
|
|
/// let x = 1;
|
|
/// let y = 2;
|
|
///
|
|
/// Foo { y, x };
|
|
/// ```
|
|
///
|
|
/// Use instead:
|
|
/// ```no_run
|
|
/// # struct Foo {
|
|
/// # x: i32,
|
|
/// # y: i32,
|
|
/// # }
|
|
/// # let x = 1;
|
|
/// # let y = 2;
|
|
/// Foo { x, y };
|
|
/// ```
|
|
#[clippy::version = "1.52.0"]
|
|
pub INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR,
|
|
pedantic,
|
|
"the order of the field init is inconsistent with the order in the struct definition"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pub struct InconsistentStructConstructor {
|
|
check_inconsistent_struct_field_initializers: bool,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl InconsistentStructConstructor {
|
|
pub fn new(conf: &'static Conf) -> Self {
|
|
Self {
|
|
check_inconsistent_struct_field_initializers: conf.check_inconsistent_struct_field_initializers,
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
impl_lint_pass!(InconsistentStructConstructor => [INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR]);
|
|
|
|
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for InconsistentStructConstructor {
|
|
fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx hir::Expr<'_>) {
|
|
let ExprKind::Struct(_, fields, _) = expr.kind else {
|
|
return;
|
|
};
|
|
let all_fields_are_shorthand = fields.iter().all(|f| f.is_shorthand);
|
|
let applicability = if all_fields_are_shorthand {
|
|
Applicability::MachineApplicable
|
|
} else if self.check_inconsistent_struct_field_initializers {
|
|
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect
|
|
} else {
|
|
return;
|
|
};
|
|
if !expr.span.from_expansion()
|
|
&& let ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(expr)
|
|
&& let Some(adt_def) = ty.ty_adt_def()
|
|
&& adt_def.is_struct()
|
|
&& let Some(local_def_id) = adt_def.did().as_local()
|
|
&& let ty_hir_id = cx.tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id)
|
|
&& let Some(variant) = adt_def.variants().iter().next()
|
|
{
|
|
let mut def_order_map = FxHashMap::default();
|
|
for (idx, field) in variant.fields.iter().enumerate() {
|
|
def_order_map.insert(field.name, idx);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if is_consistent_order(fields, &def_order_map) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
let span = field_with_attrs_span(cx.tcx, fields.first().unwrap())
|
|
.with_hi(field_with_attrs_span(cx.tcx, fields.last().unwrap()).hi());
|
|
|
|
if !fulfill_or_allowed(cx, INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR, Some(ty_hir_id)) {
|
|
span_lint_and_then(
|
|
cx,
|
|
INCONSISTENT_STRUCT_CONSTRUCTOR,
|
|
span,
|
|
"struct constructor field order is inconsistent with struct definition field order",
|
|
|diag| {
|
|
let msg = if all_fields_are_shorthand {
|
|
"try"
|
|
} else {
|
|
"if the field evaluation order doesn't matter, try"
|
|
};
|
|
let sugg = suggestion(cx, fields, &def_order_map);
|
|
diag.span_suggestion(span, msg, sugg, applicability);
|
|
},
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check whether the order of the fields in the constructor is consistent with the order in the
|
|
// definition.
|
|
fn is_consistent_order<'tcx>(fields: &'tcx [hir::ExprField<'tcx>], def_order_map: &FxHashMap<Symbol, usize>) -> bool {
|
|
let mut cur_idx = usize::MIN;
|
|
for f in fields {
|
|
let next_idx = def_order_map[&f.ident.name];
|
|
if cur_idx > next_idx {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
cur_idx = next_idx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
true
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn suggestion<'tcx>(
|
|
cx: &LateContext<'_>,
|
|
fields: &'tcx [hir::ExprField<'tcx>],
|
|
def_order_map: &FxHashMap<Symbol, usize>,
|
|
) -> String {
|
|
let ws = fields
|
|
.windows(2)
|
|
.map(|w| {
|
|
let w0_span = field_with_attrs_span(cx.tcx, &w[0]);
|
|
let w1_span = field_with_attrs_span(cx.tcx, &w[1]);
|
|
let span = w0_span.between(w1_span);
|
|
snippet(cx, span, " ")
|
|
})
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
let mut fields = fields.to_vec();
|
|
fields.sort_unstable_by_key(|field| def_order_map[&field.ident.name]);
|
|
let field_snippets = fields
|
|
.iter()
|
|
.map(|field| snippet(cx, field_with_attrs_span(cx.tcx, field), ".."))
|
|
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
|
|
|
assert_eq!(field_snippets.len(), ws.len() + 1);
|
|
|
|
let mut sugg = String::new();
|
|
for i in 0..field_snippets.len() {
|
|
sugg += &field_snippets[i];
|
|
if i < ws.len() {
|
|
sugg += &ws[i];
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
sugg
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fn field_with_attrs_span(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>, field: &hir::ExprField<'_>) -> Span {
|
|
if let Some(attr) = tcx.hir_attrs(field.hir_id).first() {
|
|
field.span.with_lo(attr.span().lo())
|
|
} else {
|
|
field.span
|
|
}
|
|
}
|