fd91925bce
The starting point for this was identical comments on two different
fields, in `ast::VariantData::Struct` and `hir::VariantData::Struct`:
```
// FIXME: investigate making this a `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`
recovered: bool
```
I tried that, and then found that I needed to add an `ErrorGuaranteed`
to `Recovered::Yes`. Then I ended up using `Recovered` instead of
`Option<ErrorGuaranteed>` for these two places and elsewhere, which
required moving `ErrorGuaranteed` from `rustc_parse` to `rustc_ast`.
This makes things more consistent, because `Recovered` is used in more
places, and there are fewer uses of `bool` and
`Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`. And safer, because it's difficult/impossible
to set `recovered` to `Recovered::Yes` without having emitted an error.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| attr | ||
| expand | ||
| util | ||
| ast.rs | ||
| ast_traits.rs | ||
| entry.rs | ||
| format.rs | ||
| lib.rs | ||
| mut_visit.rs | ||
| node_id.rs | ||
| ptr.rs | ||
| token.rs | ||
| tokenstream.rs | ||
| visit.rs | ||