It is not possible to write a declarative macro, that produces an attribute w/o
an item attached to it. This means that the `check_item` will already insert the
span in the map, if it came from an expansion. So additionally checking if the
macro came from an expansion doesn't add anything here. So the
`check_attribute` function, and with that the problematic `attr.span()` call can
be completely removed.
Fixes#14303
The `looks_like_refdef` function was assuming the range was valid, this
just adds a check to ensure that is the case. It also works around a
subtraction underflow due to the same invalid range.
changelog: [`doc_nested_refdefs`]: Fix#14287 by avoiding invalid ranges
When the manually stripped entity receives a name as the first use
through a simple `let` statement, this name can be used in the generated
`if let Some(…)` expression instead of a placeholder.
Fix#14183
changelog: [`manual_strip`]: reuse existing identifier in suggestion
when possible
For some reason, the `todo!` and `unimplemented!` macros were not
included in the list of format-supporting macros list. Since they seem
to behave exactly the same as all others like `write!` and `assert!`,
adding them now.
I wonder if we should delete the `FORMAT_MACRO_DIAG_ITEMS`, and instead
tag all macros with the `#[clippy::format_args]`?
changelog: all format-handling lints will now validate `todo!` and
`unimplemented!` macros.
These method chains can be expressed concisely with `if`/`else`.
changelog: [`obfuscated_if_else`]: support `then().unwrap_or_else()` and
`then_some().unwrap_or_else()`
```rust
let mut tmp = vec![1, 2, 3];
for b in &mut tmp {
*b = !*b;
}
```
must not suggest the invalid `tmp.fill(!*b)`.
In addition, there is another commit which cleans up two function calls
with no effect.
Fix#14189
changelog: [`manual_slice_fill`]: ensure that the initialization
expression doesn't reference the iterator
- The name of an MSRV alias should describe its functionality, and it is
not appropriate for it to be the same as the name of the lint that uses
it.
- Additionally, while `manual_div_ceil` allows setting MSRV, this is not
correctly reflected in the configuration information.
changelog: none
For some reason, the `todo!` and `unimplemented!` macros were not included in the list of format-supporting macros list. Since they seem to behave exactly the same as all others like `write!` and `assert!`, adding them now.
Roses are red,
Biolets are blue,
A typo happened,
too late now
You might be asking,
what are Biolets now?
And to be honest,
I have no clue
---
The cat of this release is `Vera` nominated by @and-reas-se
<img height=500
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/82e6fccc-1f6d-4d29-b6bb-0bd4f3584593"
alt="The cats of this Clippy release" />
Cats for the next release can be nominated in the comments :D
---
changelog: none
fixes#13934
I modified the part for checking if the map is used so that it can check
field and index exprs.
changelog: [`map_entry`]: fix FP on struct member
In the case where `iter` is a `DoubleEndedIterator`, replacing a call to
`iter.last()` (which consumes `iter`) by `iter.next_back()` (which
requires a mutable reference to `iter`) cannot be done when `iter` is a
non-mutable binding which is not a mutable reference. When possible, a
local immutable binding is made into a mutable one.
Also, the applicability is switched to `MaybeIncorrect` and a note is
added to the output when the element types have a significant drop,
because the drop order will potentially be modified because
`.next_back()` does not consume the iterator nor the elements before the
last one.
Fix#14139
changelog: [`double_ended_iterator_last`]: do not trigger on
non-reference immutable receiver, and warn about possible drop order
change
`iter.last()` will drop all elements of `iter` in order, while
`iter.next_back()` will drop the non-last elements of `iter` when
`iter` goes out of scope since `.next_back()` does not consume its
argument.
When the transformation proposed by `double_ended_iterator_last` would
concern an iterator whose element type has a significant drop, a note is
added to warn about the possible drop order change, and the suggestion
is switched from `MachineApplicable` to `MaybeIncorrect`.
In the case where `iter` is a `DoubleEndedIterator`, replacing a call to
`iter.last()` (which consumes `iter`) by `iter.next_back()` (which
requires a mutable reference to `iter`) cannot be done when `iter`
Is not a mutable binding or a mutable reference.
When `iter` is a local binding, it can be made mutable by fixing its
definition site.
Continuing the work started in #136466.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix, though for the ones that already
have a `par_` or `try_par_` prefix I added the `hir_` after that.
