Extract coverage-specific code out of `compiletest::runtest`
I had been vaguely intending to do this for a while, but seeing #89475 on the compiletest dashboard inspired me to actually go and do it.
This moves a few hundred lines of coverage-specific code out of the main module, making navigation a bit easier. There is still a small amount of coverage-specific logic in broader functions in that module, since it can't easily be moved.
This is just cut-and-paste plus fixing visibility and imports, so no functional changes.
I also removed the unit test for anonymizing line numbers in MC/DC reports, as foreshadowed by the comment I wrote when adding it. That functionality is now adequately exercised by the actual snapshot tests for MC/DC coverage.
(Removing the test now avoids the need to move it, or to make the function it calls visible.)
tier 3 target policy: clarify the point about producing assembly
I think that is already the intended meaning of the policy, but I am not sure.
Cc ``@rust-lang/compiler``
Use `rmake` for `windows-` run-make tests
Convert some Makefile tests to recipes.
I renamed "issue-85441" to "windows-ws2_32" as I think it's slightly more descriptive. EDIT: `llvm-readobj` seems to work for reading DLL imports so I've used that instead of `objdump`.
cc #121876
We want to only demand that we check for all components we expect
if we actually built the components we expect, which means
we built the LLVM. Otherwise, it isn't worth checking.
don't inhibit random field reordering on repr(packed(1))
`inhibit_struct_field_reordering_opt` being false means we exclude this type from random field shuffling. However, `packed(1)` types can still be shuffled! The logic was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48528 since it's pointless to reorder fields in packed(1) types (there's no padding that could be saved) -- but that shouldn't inhibit `-Zrandomize-layout` (which did not exist at the time).
We could add an optimization elsewhere to not bother sorting the fields for `repr(packed)` types, but I don't think that's worth the effort.
This *does* change the behavior in that we may now reorder fields of `packed(1)` structs (e.g. if there are niches, we'll try to move them to the start/end, according to `NicheBias`). We were always allowed to do that but so far we didn't. Quoting the [reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/type-layout.html):
> On their own, align and packed do not provide guarantees about the order of fields in the layout of a struct or the layout of an enum variant, although they may be combined with representations (such as C) which do provide such guarantees.
Currently, `x fmt` can print two lists of files.
- The untracked files that are skipped. Always done if within a git
repo.
- The modified files that are formatted.
But if you run with `--all` (or with `GITHUB_ACTIONS=true`) it doesn't
print anything about which files are formatted.
This commit increases consistency.
- The formatted/checked files are now always printed. And it makes it clear why
a file was formatted, e.g. with "modified".
- It uses the same code for both untracked files and formatted/checked
files. This means that now if there are a lot of untracked files just
the number will be printed, which is like the old behaviour for
modified files.
Example output:
```
fmt: skipped 31 untracked files
fmt: formatted modified file compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/instsimplify.rs
fmt: formatted modified file compiler/rustc_mir_transform/src/validate.rs
fmt: formatted modified file library/core/src/ptr/metadata.rs
fmt: formatted modified file src/bootstrap/src/core/build_steps/format.rs
```
or (with `--all`):
```
fmt: checked 3148 files
```
- Precede them all with `fmt` so it's clear where they are coming from.
- Use `error:` and `warning:` when appropriate.
- Print warnings to stderr instead of stdout
By default, `x fmt` formats/checks modified files. But it also lets you
choose one or more paths instead.
This adds significant complexity to `x fmt`. Explicit paths are
specified via `WalkBuilder::add` rather than `OverrideBuilder::add`. The
`ignore` library is not simple, and predicting the interactions between
the two mechanisms is difficult.
Here's a particularly interesting case.
- You can request a path P that is excluded by the `ignore` list in the
`rustfmt.toml`. E.g. `x fmt tests/ui/` or `x fmt tests/ui/bitwise.rs`.
- `x fmt` will add P to the walker (via `WalkBuilder::add`), traverse it
(paying no attention to the `ignore` list from the `rustfmt.toml`
file, due to the different mechanism), and call `rustfmt` on every
`.rs` file within it.
- `rustfmt` will do nothing to those `.rs` files, because it *also*
reads `rustfmt.toml` and sees that they match the `ignore` list!
It took me *ages* to debug and understand this behaviour. Not good!
`x fmt` even lets you name a path below the current directory. This was
intended to let you do things like `x fmt std` that mirror things like
`x test std`. This works by looking for `std` and finding `library/std`,
and then formatting that. Unfortuantely, this motivating case now gives
an error. When support was added in #107944, `library/std` was the only
directory named `std`. Since then, `tests/ui/std` was added, and so `x
fmt std` now gives an error.
In general, explicit paths don't seem particularly useful. The only two
cases `x fmt` really needs are:
- format/check the files I have modified (99% of uses)
- format/check all files
(While respecting the `ignore` list in `rustfmt.toml`, of course.)
So this commit moves to that model. `x fmt` will now give an error if
given an explicit path. `x fmt` now also supports a `--all` option. (And
running with `GITHUB_ACTIONS=true` also causes everything to be
formatted/checked, as before.) Much simpler!
Support `./x doc run-make-support --open`
Having easy access to the run-make-support documentation is invaluable when creating run-make tests using the new Rust recipes.
Make more of the test suite run on Mac Catalyst
Combined with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125225, the only failing parts of the test suite are in `tests/rustdoc-js`, `tests/rustdoc-js-std` and `tests/debuginfo`. Tested with:
```console
./x test --target=aarch64-apple-ios-macabi library/std
./x test --target=aarch64-apple-ios-macabi --skip=tests/rustdoc-js --skip=tests/rustdoc-js-std --skip=tests/debuginfo tests
```
Will probably put up a PR later to enable _running_ on (not just compiling for) Mac Catalyst in CI, though not sure where exactly I should do so? `src/ci/github-actions/jobs.yml`?
Note that I've deliberately _not_ enabled stack overflow handlers on iOS/tvOS/watchOS/visionOS (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/25872), but rather just skipped those tests, as it uses quite a few APIs that I'd be weary about getting rejected by the App Store (note that Swift doesn't do it on those platforms either).
r? ``@workingjubilee``
CC ``@thomcc``
``@rustbot`` label O-ios O-apple
Add `--print=check-cfg` to get the expected configs
This PR adds a new `--print` variant `check-cfg` to get the expected configs.
Details and rational can be found on the MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/743
``@rustbot`` label +F-check-cfg +S-waiting-on-MCP
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Update cargo
5 commits in a8d72c675ee52dd57f0d8f2bae6655913c15b2fb..431db31d0dbeda320caf8ef8535ea48eb3093407
2024-05-24 03:34:17 +0000 to 2024-05-28 18:17:31 +0000
- Include `lints.rust.unexpected_cfgs.check-cfg` in the fingerprint (rust-lang/cargo#13958)
- feat(test): Auto-redact elapsed time (rust-lang/cargo#13973)
- chore: Update to snapbox 0.6 (rust-lang/cargo#13963)
- fix: check if rev is full commit sha for github fast path (rust-lang/cargo#13969)
- test: switch from `drop` to `let _` due to nightly rustc change (rust-lang/cargo#13964)
r? ghost
`PackageId` is an opaque identifier whose internal format is subject to
change, so looking up the names of local crates by ID is more robust
than parsing the ID.
Resolves#3643.
