Fix formatting of `cast_abs_to_unsigned` docs
The "use instead" section of the example was not being formatted as Rust code, and the "configuration" documentation was being formatted as Rust code.
changelog: `[cast_abs_to_unsigned]` Fix example/configuration formatting
Spellcheck
I'm brand new to this so any feedback will be helpful. I set the project up locally and ran a spellcheck on it. The code changes should only be spelling corrections. I ran the build and tests and they came back successful locally.
changelog: Various spelling corrections in comments and code.
Don't lint `let_unit_value` when needed for type inferenece
fixes: #1502
Pinging `@dtolnay.` I think this is enough to fix the issue. Do you have a good list crates to test this on?
changelog: Don't lint `let_unit_value` when needed for type inference
New lint `format_add_strings`
Closes#6261
changelog: Added [`format_add_string`]: recommend using `write!` instead of appending the result of `format!`
Add `usize` cast to `clippy::manual_bits` suggestion
A fix for the suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8213
changelog: [`manual_bits`]: The suggestion now includes a cast for proper type conversion
This adds test to make sure correct behavior of lint
- The first test's option variable is not a temporary variable
- The second test does not make usage of `take()`
- The third test makes usage of `take()` and uses a temporary variable
Instead of type checking the entire expression (causing a false
positive), only type check for a subset of the expression (the receiver of
the matched function: `take()`)
This lint checks if Option::take() is used on a temporary value (a value
that is not of type &mut Option and that is not a Place expression) to
suggest omitting take()
Check for loops/closures in `local_used_after_expr`
Follow up to #8646, catches when a local is used multiple times because it's in a loop or a closure
changelog: none
fix unnecessary_to_owned about msrv
This PR fixes ``[`unnecessary_owned`]``.
## What
```rust
# sample code
fn _msrv_1_35() {
#![clippy::msrv = "1.35"]
let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
}
fn _msrv_1_36() {
#![clippy::msrv = "1.36"]
let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
}
```
If we will check this code using clippy, ``[`unnecessary_owned`]`` will modify the code as follows.
```rust
error: unnecessary use of `to_vec`
--> $DIR/unnecessary_to_owned.rs:219:14
|
LL | let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use: `["x"][..].iter().copied()`
error: unnecessary use of `to_vec`
--> $DIR/unnecessary_to_owned.rs:224:14
|
LL | let _ = &["x"][..].to_vec().into_iter();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: use: `["x"][..].iter().copied()`
```
This is incorrect. Because `Iterator::copied` was estabilished in 1.36.
## Why
This bug was caused by not separating "copied" and "clone" by reference to msrv.
89ee6aa6e3/clippy_lints/src/methods/unnecessary_to_owned.rs (L195)
So, I added a conditional branch and described the corresponding test.
Thank you in advance.
changelog: fix wrong suggestions about msrv in [`unnecessary_to_owned`]
r! `@giraffate`
Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
fixes#5714
changelog: Don't lint `manual_non_exhaustive` when the enum variant is used
Do not trigger ``[`rest_pat_in_fully_bound_structs`]`` on `#[non_exhaustive]` structs
fixes#8029
Just adds an additional check to ensure that the`ty::VariantDef` is not marked as `#[non_exhaustive]`.
changelog: Do not apply ``[`rest_pat_in_fully_bound_structs`]`` on structs marked as non exhaustive.
Prevent infinite (exponential) recursion in only_used_in_recursion
This simplifies the visitor code a bit and prevents checking expressions
multiple times. I still think this lint should be removed for now,
because its code isn't really tested.
Fixes#8689
**NOTE:** Before merging this, we should talk about removing and revisiting this lint. See my comment in #8689
changelog: prevent infinite recursion in [`only_used_in_recursion`]
This simplifies the visitor code a bit and prevents checking expressions
multiple times. I still think this lint should be removed for now,
because its code isn't really tested.
