Detect incorrect vtable alignment during const eval
This PR fixes#86132 by detecting invalid alignment values for trait objects in the interpreter, and emitting an error about this conversion failure, to avoid the ICE.
I've noticed that the error emitted at a50d72158e/compiler/rustc_mir/src/interpret/traits.rs (L163-L166) doesn't seem to be present in the const-ub tests, so I've tried adding a test that triggers both of these cases: one for the invalid size, and another for the invalid alignment that #86132 tracks (I have found different magic values triggering different `Align::from_bytes` errors than the "power of 2" one, if need be).
However, when doing that, I *cannot* for the life of me figure out the correct incantation to make these 2 errors trigger with the "it is undefined behavior to use this value" message rather than the "any use of this value will cause an error" lint.
I've tried Oli's suggestions of different values, tuples and arrays, using the transparent wrapper trick from the other tests and I was only able to trigger the regular const-ub errors about the size of the vtable, or that the drop pointer was invalid. Maybe these "type validation failed" errors happen before this part of the interpreter is reached and there just needs some magic incorrect values to bypass them, I don't know.
Since this fixes an ICE, and if the constants are indeed used, these 2 tests will turn into a hard error, I thought I'd open the PR anyways. And if ```@RalfJung``` you know of a way I could manage that (if you think that these tests are worth checking that the `throw_ub_format!` does indeed create const-ub errors as we expect) I'd be grateful.
For that reason, r? ```@RalfJung``` and cc ```@oli-obk.```
Do not suggest ampmut if rhs is already mutable
Removes invalid suggestion in #85765, although it should highlight the user type instead of the local variable.
Looking at the comments of this line:
84b1005bfd/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs (L2107)
It was intentionally set to `None`, causing it to highlight the local variable instead. I am not sure if I will be able to fix it.
Fixes#85765
Fix some diagnostic issues with const_generics_defaults feature gate
This PR makes a few changes:
- print out const param defaults in "lifetime ordering" errors rather than discarding them
- update `is_simple_text` to account for const params when checking if a type has no generics, this was causing a note to be failed to add to an error message
- fixes some diagnostic wording that incorrectly said there was ordering restrictions between type/const params despite the `const_generics_defaults` feature gate is active
Suggest a trailing comma if a 1-tuple is expected and a parenthesized expression is found
This pull request fixes#86100. The following code:
```rust
fn main() {
let t: (i32,) = (1);
}
```
currently produces:
```
warning: unnecessary parentheses around assigned value
--> test.rs:2:21
|
2 | let t: (i32,) = (1);
| ^^^ help: remove these parentheses
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_parens)]` on by default
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> test.rs:2:21
|
2 | let t: (i32,) = (1);
| ------ ^^^ expected tuple, found integer
| |
| expected due to this
|
= note: expected tuple `(i32,)`
found type `{integer}`
error: aborting due to previous error; 1 warning emitted
```
With my changes, I get the same warning and the following error:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> test.rs:2:21
|
2 | let t: (i32,) = (1);
| ------ ^^^ expected tuple, found integer
| |
| expected due to this
|
= note: expected tuple `(i32,)`
found type `{integer}`
help: use a trailing comma to create a tuple with one element
|
2 | let t: (i32,) = (1,);
| ^^^^
```
i.e. I have added a suggestion to add a trailing comma to create a 1-tuple. This suggestion is only issued if a 1-tuple is expected and the expression (`(1)` in the example above) is surrounded by parentheses and does not already have a tuple type. In this situation, I'd say that it is pretty likely that the user meant to create a tuple.
std: Stabilize wasm simd intrinsics
This commit performs two changes to stabilize Rust support for
WebAssembly simd intrinsics:
* The stdarch submodule is updated to pull in rust-lang/stdarch#1179.
* The `wasm_target_feature` feature gate requirement for the `simd128`
feature has been removed, stabilizing the name `simd128`.
This should conclude the FCP started on #74372 and...
Closes#74372
This commit performs two changes to stabilize Rust support for
WebAssembly simd intrinsics:
* The stdarch submodule is updated to pull in rust-lang/stdarch#1179.
* The `wasm_target_feature` feature gate requirement for the `simd128`
feature has been removed, stabilizing the name `simd128`.
This should conclude the FCP started on #74372 and...
Closes#74372
MVP for using rust-lld as part of cc
Will fix#71519. I need to figure out how to write a test showing that lld is used instead of whatever linker cc normally uses. When I manually run rustc using `echo 'fn main() {}' | RUSTC_LOG=rustc_codegen_ssa:🔙:link=debug ./rustc -Clinker-flavor=gcc-lld --crate-type bin -Clink-arg=-Wl,-v` (thanks to bjorn3 on Zulip), I can see that lld is used, but I'm not sure how to inspect that output in a test.
Add the x86_64-gnu-stable builder
During the 1.52 release process we had to deal with some commits that passed the test suite on the nightly branch but failed on the beta or stable branch. In that case it was due to some UI tests including the channel name in the output, but other changes might also be dependent on the channel.
This commit adds a new CI job that runs the Linux x86_64 test suite with the stable branch, ensuring nightly changes also work as stable. To ensure the new job works the following other changes are present:
* The `ui-fulldeps/session-derive-errors.rs` test has been disabled on beta and stable, which required adding support for `// ignore-{channel}` and `// only-{channel}`.
* The `rustdoc/intra-doc/field.rs` has been fixed.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/release-team/issues/11
ignore test if rust-lld not found
create ld -> rust-lld symlink at build time instead of run time
for testing in ci
copy instead of symlinking
remove linux check
test for linker, suggestions from bjorn3
fix overly restrictive lld matcher
use -Zgcc-ld flag instead of -Clinker-flavor
refactor code adding lld to gcc path
revert ci changes
suggestions from petrochenkov
rename gcc_ld to gcc-ld in dirs
Make copy/copy_nonoverlapping fn's again
Make copy/copy_nonoverlapping fn's again, rather than intrinsics.
This a short-term change to address issue #84297.
It effectively reverts PRs #81167#81238 (and part of #82967), #83091, and parts of #79684.
Peephole optimize `x == false` and `x != true`
This adds peephole optimizations to make `x == false`, `false == x`, `x != true`, and `true != x` get optimized to `!x` in the `instcombine` MIR pass. That pass currently handles `x == true` -> `x` already.
Include macro name in 'local ambiguity' error
Currently, we only point at the span of the macro argument. When the
macro call is itself generated by another macro, this can make it
difficult or impossible to determine which macro is responsible for
producing the error.
Enable rustdoc to document safe wasm intrinsics
This commit fixes an issue not found during #84988 where rustdoc is used
to document cross-platform intrinsics but it was requiring that
functions which use `#[target_feature]` are `unsafe` erroneously, even
if they're WebAssembly specific. Rustdoc today, for example, already has
a special case where it enables annotations like
`#[target_feature(enable = "simd128")]` on platforms other than
WebAssembly. The purpose of this commit is to relax the "require all
`#[target_feature]` functions are `unsafe`" requirement for all targets
whenever rustdoc is running, enabling all targets to fully document
other targets, such as WebAssembly, where intrinsics functions aren't
always `unsafe`.
Comment out unused error codes and add description for E0316
I have added an extended description of `E0316` and commented out a bunch of unused error codes to make clear the fact that they are no longer in use. You can check for yourself with
```shell
for ec in \
E0314 E0315 E0473 E0474 E0475 E0479 E0480 E0481 \
E0483 E0484 E0485 E0486 E0487 E0488 E0489
do
if [ ! -z "`grep -r $ec compiler/* --exclude-dir=rustc_error_codes`" ]
then
echo $ec
false
fi
done
```
i.e. these error codes appear nowhere in the compiler code and thus cannot be emitted.
r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
Default panic message should print Box<dyn Any>
Closes#86039
Prior to this patch, the panic message from running the following code would be `thread 'main' panicked at 'Box<Any>'...`
```rust
use std::panic::panic_any;
fn main() {
panic_any(42);
}
```
This patch updates the phrasing to be more consistent. It now instead shows the following panic message:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'Box<dyn Any>', ...
```
It's a very small fix 😄
Currently, we only point at the span of the macro argument. When the
macro call is itself generated by another macro, this can make it
difficult or impossible to determine which macro is responsible for
producing the error.
