Fix suggestion of additional `pub` when using `pub pub fn ...`
Fix#87694.
Marked as draft to start with because I want to explore doing the same fix for `const const fn` and other repeated-but-valid keywords.
`@rustbot` label A-diagnostics D-invalid-suggestion T-compiler
Implement let-else type annotations natively
Tracking issue: #87335Fixes#89688, fixes#89807, edit: fixes #89960 as well
As explained in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89688#issuecomment-940405082, the previous desugaring moved the let-else scrutinee into a dummy variable, which meant if you wanted to refer to it again in the else block, it had moved.
This introduces a new hir type, ~~`hir::LetExpr`~~ `hir::Let`, which takes over all the fields of `hir::ExprKind::Let(...)` and adds an optional type annotation. The `hir::Let` is then treated like a `hir::Local` when type checking a function body, specifically:
* `GatherLocalsVisitor` overrides a new `Visitor::visit_let_expr` and does pretty much exactly what it does for `visit_local`, assigning a local type to the `hir::Let` ~~(they could be deduplicated but they are right next to each other, so at least we know they're the same)~~
* It reuses the code in `check_decl_local` to typecheck the `hir::Let`, simply returning 'bool' for the expression type after doing that.
* ~~`FnCtxt::check_expr_let` passes this local type in to `demand_scrutinee_type`, and then imitates check_decl_local's pattern checking~~
* ~~`demand_scrutinee_type` (the blindest change for me, please give this extra scrutiny) uses this local type instead of of creating a new one~~
* ~~Just realised the `check_expr_with_needs` was passing NoExpectation further down, need to pass the type there too. And apparently this Expectation API already exists.~~
Some other misc notes:
* ~~Is the clippy code supposed to be autoformatted? I tried not to give huge diffs but maybe some rustfmt changes simply haven't hit it yet.~~
* in `rustc_ast_lowering/src/block.rs`, I noticed some existing `self.alias_attrs()` calls in `LoweringContext::lower_stmts` seem to be copying attributes from the lowered locals/etc to the statements. Is that right? I'm new at this, I don't know.
Do array-slice equality via array equality, rather than always via slices
~~Draft because it needs a rebase after #91766 eventually gets through bors.~~
This enables the optimizations from #85828 to be used for array-to-slice comparisons too, not just array-to-array.
For example, <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=5f9ba69b3d5825a782f897c830d3a6aa>
```rust
pub fn demo(x: &[u8], y: [u8; 4]) -> bool {
*x == y
}
```
Currently writes the array to stack for no reason:
```nasm
sub rsp, 4
mov dword ptr [rsp], edx
cmp rsi, 4
jne .LBB0_1
mov eax, dword ptr [rdi]
cmp eax, dword ptr [rsp]
sete al
add rsp, 4
ret
.LBB0_1:
xor eax, eax
add rsp, 4
ret
```
Whereas with the change in this PR it just compares it directly:
```nasm
cmp rsi, 4
jne .LBB1_1
cmp dword ptr [rdi], edx
sete al
ret
.LBB1_1:
xor eax, eax
ret
```
extend `simplify_type`
might cause a slight perf inprovement and imo more accurately represents what types there are.
considering that I was going to use this in #85048 it seems like we might need this in the future anyways 🤷
Make `TyS::is_suggestable` check for non-suggestable types structually
Not sure if I went overboard checking substs in dyn types, etc. Let me know if I should simplify this function.
Fixes#91832
Handle unordered const/ty generics for object lifetime defaults
*feel like I should have a PR description but cant think of what to put here*
r? ```@lcnr```
Readd track_caller to Result::from_residual
This is a followup on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87401 in and an attempt to move the issue towards resolution.
As part of the overhaul of the Try trait we removed the ability for errors to grab location information during propagation via `?` with the builtin `std::result::Result`. The previously linked issue has a fair bit of discussion into the reasons for and against the usage of `#[track_caller]` on the `FromResidual` impl on `Result` that I will do my best to summarize.
---
### For
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87401#issuecomment-915053533: Difficulties with using non `std::result::Result` like types
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87401#issuecomment-978355102: Inconsistency with functionality provided for recoverable (Result) and non-recoverable errors (panic), where panic provides a location and Result does not, pushing some users towards using panic
### Against
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277#issuecomment-885322833: concern that this will bloat callers that never use this data
---
Personally, I want to quantify the performance / bloat impact of re-adding this attribute, and fully evaluate the pros and cons before deciding if I need to switch `eyre` to have a custom `Result` type, which would also mean I need `try_trait_v2` to be stabilized, cc `@scottmcm.` If the performance impact is minor enough in the general case I think I would prefer that the default `Result` type has the ability to track location information for consistency with `panic` error reporting, and leave it to applications that need particularly high performance to handle the micro optimizations of introducing their own efficient custom Result type or matching manually.
Alternatively, I wonder if the performance penalty on code that doesn't use the location information on `FromResidual` could be mitigated via new optimizations.
Use `OutputFilenames` to generate output file for `-Zllvm-time-trace`
The resulting profile will include the crate name and will be stored in
the `--out-dir` directory.
This implementation makes it convenient to use LLVM time trace together
with cargo, in the contrast to the previous implementation which would
overwrite profiles or store them in `.cargo/registry/..`.
Tweak errors coming from `for`-loop, `?` and `.await` desugaring
* Suggest removal of `.await` on non-`Future` expression
* Keep track of obligations introduced by desugaring
* Remove span pointing at method for obligation errors coming from desugaring
* Point at called local sync `fn` and suggest making it `async`
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
--> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:9:10
|
LL | boo().await;
| -----^^^^^^ `()` is not a future
| |
| this call returns `()`
|
= help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
help: do not `.await` the expression
|
LL - boo().await;
LL + boo();
|
help: alternatively, consider making `fn boo` asynchronous
|
LL | async fn boo () {}
| +++++
```
Fix#66731.
Stabilize asm! and global_asm!
Tracking issue: #72016
It's been almost 2 years since the original [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2850) was posted and we're finally ready to stabilize this feature!
The main changes in this PR are:
- Removing `asm!` and `global_asm!` from the prelude as per the decision in #87228.
- Stabilizing the `asm` and `global_asm` features.
- Removing the unstable book pages for `asm` and `global_asm`. The contents are moved to the [reference](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1105) and [rust by example](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-by-example/pull/1483).
- All links to these pages have been removed to satisfy the link checker. In a later PR these will be replaced with links to the reference or rust by example.
- Removing the automatic suggestion for using `llvm_asm!` instead of `asm!` if you're still using the old syntax, since it doesn't work anymore with `asm!` no longer being in the prelude. This only affects code that predates the old LLVM-style `asm!` being renamed to `llvm_asm!`.
- Updating `stdarch` and `compiler-builtins`.
- Updating all the tests.
r? `@joshtriplett`
This'll still go via slices eventually for large arrays, but this way slice comparisons to short arrays can use the same memcmp-avoidance tricks.
Added some tests for all the combinations to make sure I didn't accidentally infinitely-recurse something.
Looser check for overflowing_binary_op
Fix for issue #91636 tight check resulted in ICE, this makes the check a little looser. It seems `eq` allows comparing of `supertype` and `subtype` if `lhs = supertype` and `rhs = subtype` but not vice versa, is this intended behavior ?
Return an error when `eval_rvalue_with_identities` fails
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
Fixes#91725.
r? `@oli-obk`
Recover on invalid operators `<>` and `<=>`
Thanks to #89871 for showing me how to do this.
Next, I think it'd be nice to recover on `<=>` too, like #89871 intended, if this even works.
Previously some code paths would fail to evaluate the rvalue, while
incorrectly indicating success with `Ok`. As a result the previous value
of lhs could have been incorrectly const propagated.
Suggest to specify a target triple when lang item is missing
It is very common for newbies to embedded to hit this confusing error when forgetting to specify the target.
Source: me googling this error many times.
## Possible changes
* We could possibly restrict the note+help to only be included on eh_personality lang item if that helped reduce false positives, but its also possible doing so would just increase false negatives
* Open to any suggestions on rewriting the messages
* We could possibly remove the `.cargo/config` alternative to avoid the message getting too noisy but I think its valuable to have as its the correct approach for most embedded projects so that `cargo build` just works.
r? rust-lang/diagnostics
manually implement `Hash` for `DefId`
This might speed up hashing for hashers that can work on individual u64s. Just as an experiment, suggested in a reddit thread on `FxHasher`. cc `@nnethercote`
Note that this should not be merged as is without cfg-ing the code path for 64 bits.
