Erase late-bound regions before computing vtable debuginfo name.
Fixes#90019.
The `msvc_enum_fallback()` for computing enum type names needs to access the memory layout of niche enums in order to determine the type name. `compute_debuginfo_vtable_name()` did not properly erase regions before computing type names which made memory layout computation ICE when encountering un-erased regions.
r? `@wesleywiser`
Fix wrong niche calculation when 2+ niches are placed at the start
When the niche is at the start, existing code incorrectly uses 1 instead of count for subtraction.
Fix#90038
`@rustbot` label: T-compiler
Add test for issue #84957 - `str.as_bytes()` in a `const` expression
Hi, this PR adds a test for issue #84957 . I'm quite new to rustc so let me know if there's anything else that needs doing 😄Closes#84957
Do not promote values with const drop that need to be dropped
Changes from #88558 allowed using `~const Drop` in constants by
introducing a new `NeedsNonConstDrop` qualif.
The new qualif was also used for promotion purposes, and allowed
promotion to happen for values that needs to be dropped but which
do have a const drop impl.
Since for promoted the drop implementation is never executed,
this lead to observable change in behaviour. For example:
```rust
struct Panic();
impl const Drop for Panic {
fn drop(&mut self) {
panic!();
}
}
fn main() {
let _ = &Panic();
}
```
Restore the use of `NeedsDrop` qualif during promotion to avoid the issue.
Suggest a case insensitive match name regardless of levenshtein distance
Fixes#86170
Currently, `find_best_match_for_name` only returns a case insensitive match name depending on a Levenshtein distance. It's a bit unfortunate that that hides some suggestions for typos like `Bar` -> `BAR`. That idea is from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46347#discussion_r153701834, but I think it still makes some sense to show a candidate when we find a case insensitive match name as it's more like a typo.
Skipped the `candidate != lookup` check because the current (i.e, `levenshtein_match`) returns the exact same `Symbol` anyway but it doesn't seem to confuse anything on UI tests.
r? ``@estebank``
Fix macro_rules! duplication when reexported in the same module
This can append if within the same module a `#[macro_export] macro_rules!`
is declared but also a reexport of itself producing two export of the same
macro in the same module. In that case we only want to document it once.
Before:
```
Module {
is_crate: true,
items: [
Id("0:4"), // pub use crate::repro as repro2;
Id("0:3"), // macro_rules! repro
Id("0:3"), // duplicate, same as above
],
}
```
After:
```
Module {
is_crate: true,
items: [
Id("0:4"), // pub use crate::repro as repro2;
Id("0:3"), // macro_rules! repro
],
}
```
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89852
The const qualification was so far performed before the promotion and
the implementation assumed that it will never encounter a promoted.
With `const_precise_live_drops` feature, checking for live drops is
delayed until after drop elaboration, which in turn runs after
promotion. so the assumption is no longer true. When evaluating
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is now possible to encounter promoteds.
Use type base qualification for the promoted. It is a sound
approximation in general, and in the specific case of promoteds and
`NeedsNonConstDrop` it is precise.
Debug logging during incremental compilation had been broken for some
time, until #89343 fixed it (among other things). Add a test so this is
less likely to break without being noticed. This test is nearly a copy
of the `src/test/ui/rustc-rust-log.rs` test, but tests debug logging in
the incremental compliation code paths.
Remove redundant member-constraint check
impl trait will, for each lifetime in the hidden type, register a "member constraint" that says the lifetime must be equal or outlive one of the lifetimes of the impl trait. These member constraints will be solved by borrowck
But, as you can see in the big red block of removed code, there was an ad-hoc check for member constraints happening at the site where they get registered. This check had some minor effects on diagnostics, but will fall down on its feet with my big type alias impl trait refactor. So we removed it and I pulled the removal out into a (hopefully) reviewable PR that works on master directly.
Changes from #88558 allowed using `~const Drop` in constants by
introducing a new `NeedsNonConstDrop` qualif.
The new qualif was also used for promotion purposes, and allowed
promotion to happen for values that needs to be dropped but which
do have a const drop impl.
Since for promoted the drop implementation is never executed,
this lead to observable change in behaviour. For example:
```rust
struct Panic();
impl const Drop for Panic {
fn drop(&mut self) {
panic!();
}
}
fn main() {
let _ = &Panic();
}
```
Restore the use of `NeedsDrop` qualif during promotion to avoid the issue.
Index and hash HIR as part of lowering
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88186
~Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88880 (see merge commit).~
Once HIR is lowered, it is later indexed by the `index_hir` query and hashed for `crate_hash`. This PR moves those post-processing steps to lowering itself. As a side objective, the HIR crate data structure is refactored as an `IndexVec<LocalDefId, Option<OwnerInfo<'hir>>>` where `OwnerInfo` stores all the relevant information for an HIR owner.
r? `@michaelwoerister`
cc `@petrochenkov`
The affected crates have had plenty of time to update.
By keeping these as lints rather than making them hard errors,
we ensure that downstream crates will still be able to compile,
even if they transitive depend on broken versions of the affected
crates.
This should hopefully discourage anyone from writing any
new code which relies on the backwards-compatibility behavior.
Nicer error message if the user attempts to do let...else if
Gives a nice "conditional `else if` is not supported for `let...else`" error when encountering a `let...else if` pattern, as suggested in the [let...else tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87335#issuecomment-944846205).
Some "parenthesis" and "parentheses" fixes
"Parenthesis" is the singular (e.g. one `(` or one `)`) and "parentheses" is the plural (multiple `(` or `)`s) and this is not hard to mix up so here are some fixes for that.
Inspired by #89958
ty::pretty: prevent infinite recursion for `extern crate` paths.
Fixes#55779, fixes#87932.
This fix is based on `@estebank's` idea in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55779#issuecomment-614758510 - but instead of trying to get `try_print_visible_def_path_recur`'s cycle detection to work in this case, this PR "just" disables the "visible path" feature when printing the path to an `extern crate`, so that the old recursion chain of `try_print_visible_def_path -> print_def_path -> try_print_visible_def_path`, is now impossible.
Both tests have been confirmed to crash `rustc` because of a stack overflow, without the fix.
