Normalize aliases to correct kind of error term
Fixes#140642
When normalizing an alias to an error in the old solver, normalize to the same term kind as the alias being normalized instead of always to a type error.
r? lcnr
Fix `FnOnce` impl for `AsyncFn`/`AsyncFnMut` self-borrowing closures in new solver
This only affects closures that are "`AsyncFn`/`AsyncFnMut`" in their calling capability that are being called with the `FnOnce` trait.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/217
r? lcnr
Emit a warning if the doctest `main` function will not be run
Fixes#140310.
I think we could try to go much further like adding a "link" (ie UI annotations) on the `main` function in the doctest. However that will require some more computation, not sure if it's worth it or not. Can still be done in a follow-up if we want it.
For now, this PR does two things:
1. Pass the `DiagCtxt` to the doctest parser to emit the warning.
2. Correctly generate the `Span` to where the doctest is starting (I hope the way I did it isn't too bad either...).
cc `@fmease`
r? `@notriddle`
add doc alias `replace_first` for `str::replacen`
`replace_first` is a sensible name for a function, analogous to actually existing `<[_]>::split_first`, for example. (I just saw someone try to search for it)
I think it's reasonable to add such an alias for `replacen`, which replaces the first occurrence of passed a 1.
rustdoc-json: Remove false docs and add test for inline attribute
The docs about how `#[inline]` was represented isn't true. Updates the comment, and adds a test.
CC #137645
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Add bors environment to CI
This will be used to access secrets once we move off rust-lang-ci. The PR configures the environment:
- Only for `rust-lang/rust`, so that it doesn't affect `rust-lang-ci/rust` before we switch (we can remove this condition later, but the environment likely won't work for forks anyway, so we might as well just keep it to make fork CI work)
- Only for the `try`/`auto` branches, so that PR CI still works.
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/infra-team/issues/188
r? `@marcoieni`
dont handle bool transmute
removes `transmute(u8) -> bool` suggestion due to ambiguity, leave it for clippy
elaboration on ambiguity in question:
`transmute::<u8, bool>(x)` will codegen to an `assume(u8 < 2)`;
`_ == 1` or `_ != 0` or `_ % 2 == 0` would remove that assumption
`match _ { x @ (0 | 1) => x == 1, _ => std::hint::unreachable_unchecked() }` is very verbose
`@rustbot` label L-unnecessary_transmutes
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140526 (docs: Specify that common sort functions sort in an ascending direction)
- #141230 (std: fix doctest and explain for `as_slices` and `as_mut_slices` in `VecDeque`)
- #141341 (limit impls of `VaArgSafe` to just types that are actually safe)
- #141347 (incorrectly prefer builtin `dyn` impls :3)
- #141351 (Move -Zcrate-attr injection to just after crate root parsing)
- #141356 (lower bodies' params to thir before the body's value)
- #141357 (`unpretty=thir-tree`: don't require the final expr to be the body's value)
- #141363 (Document why we allow escaping bound vars in LTA norm)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Document why we allow escaping bound vars in LTA norm
r? lcnr
followup from the const normalization PR. I think I now understand why free alias norm is funny about binders
`unpretty=thir-tree`: don't require the final expr to be the body's value
Two motivations for this:
- I couldn't find a comment motivating this hard-coding. I can imagine it might be easier to read `unpretty=thir-flat` output if the final expression in the THIR is always the body's value, but if that's the reason, that should be the justification in the source. I can also imagine it's meant to check that all expressions will be visited by the pretty-printer, but the existing check doesn't quite do that either.
- Guard patterns (#129967) contain expressions, so lowering params containing guard patterns may add more expressions to the THIR. Currently a body's params are lowered after its expression, so guard expressions in params would end up last, breaking this. As an alternative, the params could be lowered first (#141356).
lower bodies' params to thir before the body's value
Two motivations for this:
- Lowering params first means errors from lowering the params are emitted before errors from lowering the body's expression. This comes up in [tests/ui/associated-consts/associated-const-type-parameter-pattern.stderr](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...dianne:rust:thir-lower-params-before-body-expr?expand=1#diff-acac6ea10e991af0da91633e08b2739f9f9ca0c8f826401b6ba829914d0806f2), where both the params and expression encounter errors in translating consts to patterns. This change puts the errors in the order they appear in the source file.
- Guard patterns (#129967) contain expressions, so lowering params containing guard patterns may add more expressions to the THIR. However, there's a check for `-Zunpretty=thir-tree` that the final expression in the THIR corresponds to its value [(link)](c43786c9b7/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/builder/mod.rs (L453-L455)); lowering params last would break this. As an alternative way to get guard patterns to work, I think the pretty-printer could use the expression returned by `thir_body` and the check could be removed or changed (#141357).
incorrectly prefer builtin `dyn` impls :3
This makes #57893 slightly more exploitable with the new solver. It's still strictly better than the old solver and the underlying unsoundness persists in the new one even without this preference.
Properly fixing #57893 is something we've been looking at more deeply recently and discussed at the [Types Meetup during the All-Hands](https://hackmd.io/rz-4ghMzTb2wXOkdLKHaHw#Dyn-traits). Whatever approach we'll end up deciding on will likely require a fairly long transition period and some significant further design work. This should not block `-Znext-solver`.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/183
r? `@compiler-errors` cc `@rust-lang/types`
limit impls of `VaArgSafe` to just types that are actually safe
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44930
Retrieving 8- or 16-bit integer arguments from a `VaList` is not safe, because such types are subject to upcasting. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61275#issuecomment-2193942535 for more detail.
This PR also makes the instances of `VaArgSafe` visible in the documentation, and uses a private sealed trait to make sure users cannot create additional impls of `VaArgSafe`, which would almost certainly cause UB.
r? `@workingjubilee`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #141267 (only resolve top-level guard patterns' guards once)
- #141280 (Use Docker cache from the current repository)
- #141296 (Async drop fix for 'broken mir, place has deref as later projection')
- #141328 (When AsyncDrop impl is empty, sync drop generated in elaborator)
- #141332 (Do not eagerly fold consts in `normalize_param_env_or_error` if new solver)
- #141333 (Use `DeepRejectCtxt` in `assemble_inherent_candidates_from_param`)
- #141334 (eagerly check nested obligations when coercing fndefs)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not eagerly fold consts in `normalize_param_env_or_error` if new solver
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/213
Given:
```
trait Trait: Deref<Target = [u8; { 1 + 1 }]> {}
```
when elaborating param env for `Trait`, we have `Self: Trait`, `Self: Deref<Target = [u8; {anon const}]>`.
Before this PR, we would fold the anon consts away *before* elaborating. However, we end up getting another *un-folded* copy of the anon const from elaborating `Self: Trait`. This leads to normalization ambiguity.
r? lcnr
Use Docker cache from the current repository
This is needed to make the cache work after moving CI from the `rust-lang-ci` org to `rust-lang`. Shouldn't be merged until we actually move bors.
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/infra-team/issues/188
r? `@marcoieni`
only resolve top-level guard patterns' guards once
We resolve guard patterns' guards in `resolve_pattern_inner`, so to avoid resolving them multiple times, we must avoid doing so earlier. To accomplish this, `LateResolutionVisitor::visit_pat` contains a case for guard patterns that avoids visiting their guards while walking patterns.
This PR fixes#141265, which was due to `visit::walk_pat` being used instead; this meant guards at the top level of a pattern would be visited twice. e.g. it would ICE on `for x if x in [] {}`, but not `for (x if x) in [] {}`. `visit_pat` was already used for the guard pattern in the second example, on account of the top-level pattern being parens.
8 and 16-bit integers are subject to upcasting in C, and hence are not reliably safe. users should perform their own casting and deal with the consequences
Match on lang item kind instead of using an if/else chain
Similar to how the new solver does this. Just noticed while I was adding a new entry to the chain 😆
