Ensure let stmt compound assignment removal suggestion respect codepoint boundaries
Previously we would try to issue a suggestion for `let x <op>= 1`, i.e.
a compound assignment within a `let` binding, to remove the `<op>`. The
suggestion code unfortunately incorrectly assumed that the `<op>` is an
exactly-1-byte ASCII character, but this assumption is incorrect because
we also recover Unicode-confusables like `➖=` as `-=`. In this example,
the suggestion code used a `+ BytePos(1)` to calculate the span of the
`<op>` codepoint that looks like `-` but the mult-byte Unicode
look-alike would cause the suggested removal span to be inside a
multi-byte codepoint boundary, triggering a codepoint boundary
assertion.
The fix is to use `SourceMap::start_point(token_span)` which properly accounts for codepoint boundaries.
Fixes#128845.
cc #128790
r? ````@fmease````
Use `SourceMap::end_point` instead of `- BytePos(1)` in arg removal suggestion
Previously, we tried to remove extra arg commas when providing extra arg removal suggestions. One of
the edge cases is having to account for an arg that has a closing delimiter `)` following it.
However, the previous suggestion code assumed that the delimiter is in fact exactly the 1-byte `)`
character. This assumption was proven incorrect, because we recover from Unicode-confusable
delimiters in the parser, which means that the ending delimiter could be a multi-byte codepoint
that looks *like* a `)`. Subtracing 1 byte could land us in the middle of a codepoint, triggering a
codepoint boundary assertion.
This is fixed by using `SourceMap::end_point` which properly accounts for codepoint boundaries.
Fixes#128717.
cc ````@fmease```` and #128790
use stable sort to sort multipart diagnostics
I think a stable sort should be used to sort the different parts of a multipart selection. The current unstable sort uses the text of the suggestion as a tie-breaker. That just doesn't seem right, and the order of the input is a better choice I think, because it gives the diagnostic author more control.
This came up when I was building a suggestion where
```rust
fn foo() {}
```
must be turned into an unsafe function, and an attribute must be added
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "...")]
unsafe fn foo() {}
```
In this example, the two suggestions occur at the same position, but the order is extremely important: unsafe must come after the attribute. But the situation changes if there is a pub/pub(crate), and if the unsafe is already present. It just out that because of the suggestion text, there is no way for me to order the suggestions correctly.
This change probably should be tested, but are there tests of the diagnostics code itself in the tests?
r? ```@estebank```
add `builder-config` into tarball sources
This will be useful for certain scenarios where developers want to know how the tarball sources were generated. We also want this to check for CI rustc incompatible options on bootstrap.
Blocker for #122709
r? Kobzol
VxWorks code refactored
1. Extern TaskNameSet as minimum supported version of os is VxWorks 7 which would have taskNameSet
2. Vx_TASK_NAME_LEN is 31 on VxWorks7, defined variable res.
3. Add unsafe blocks on Non::Zero usage in available_parallelism()
4. Update vxworks docs.
r? `@tgross35`
cc `@devnexen`
Add `Steal::is_stolen()`
Writers of rustc drivers (such as myself) often encounter stealing issues. It is currently impossible to gracefully handle them. This PR adds a `Steal::is_stolen()` function for that purpose.
Miscellaneous improvements to struct tail normalization
1. Make checks for foreign tails more accurate by normalizing the struct tail. I didn't write a test for this one.
2. Normalize when computing struct tail for `offset_of` for slice/str. This fixes the new solver only.
3. Normalizing when computing tails for disaligned reference check. This fixes both solvers.
r? lcnr
This will be useful for certain scenarios where developers want to know
how the tarball sources were generated. We also want this to check for CI
rustc incompatible options on bootstrap.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Previously we would try to issue a suggestion for `let x <op>= 1`, i.e.
a compound assignment within a `let` binding, to remove the `<op>`. The
suggestion code unfortunately incorrectly assumed that the `<op>` is an
exactly-1-byte ASCII character, but this assumption is incorrect because
we also recover Unicode-confusables like `➖=` as `-=`. In this example,
the suggestion code used a `+ BytePos(1)` to calculate the span of the
`<op>` codepoint that looks like `-` but the mult-byte Unicode
look-alike would cause the suggested removal span to be inside a
multi-byte codepoint boundary, triggering a codepoint boundary
assertion.
Issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128845>
For codepoint boundary assertion triggered by a let stmt compound
assignment removal suggestion when encountering recovered multi-byte
compound ops.
Issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/128845>
Parser has error recovery for Unicode-confusables, which includes the
right parentheses `)`. If a multi-byte right parentheses look-alike
reaches the argument removal suggestion diagnostics, it would trigger an
assertion because the diagnostics used `- BytePos(1)` which can land
within a multi-byte codepoint.
This is fixed by using `SourceMap::end_point` to find the final right
delimiter codepoint, which correctly respects codepoint boundaries.
run-make: enable msvc for staticlib-dylib-linkage
`-Zstaticlib-allow-rdylib-deps` on MSVC returns things like `/LIBPATH:R:\rust\build\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\test\run-make\staticlib-dylib-linkage\rmake_out`. That is a linker argument rather than a `cc` argument. Which makes sense because rustc interacts directly with the linker on MSVC targets. So we need to tell the C compiler to pass on the arguments to the linker.
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
run-make: enable msvc for redundant-libs
The issue here was that `foo` was not exporting any functions therefore creating an import library was unnecessary and elided by the linker.
I fixed it by exporting the functions.
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
Don't inline tainted MIR bodies
Don't inline MIR bodies that are tainted, since they're not necessarily well-formed.
Fixes#128601 (I didn't add a new test, just copied one from the crashes, since they're the same root cause).
Fixes#122909.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #128640 (rwlock: disable 'frob' test in Miri on macOS)
- #128791 (Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn`)
- #128806 (Split `ColorConfig` off of `HumanReadableErrorType`)
- #128818 (std float tests: special-case Miri in feature detection)
- #128834 (rustdoc: strip unreachable modules)
- #128836 (rustdoc-json: add a test for impls on private & hidden types)
- #128837 (Clippy subtree update)
- #128851 (Add comment that bors did not see pushed before it merged)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add comment that bors did not see pushed before it merged
In #128612, bors merged 470ada2de0 instead of 1e07c19.
This means it dropped a useful comment I added, and a stage rename that is more descriptive.
Don't implement `AsyncFn` for `FnDef`/`FnPtr` that wouldnt implement `Fn`
Due to unsafety, ABI, or the presence of target features, some `FnDef`/`FnPtr` types don't implement `Fn*`. Do the same for `AsyncFn*`.
Noticed this due to #128764, but this isn't really related to that ICE, which is fixed in #128792.
rwlock: disable 'frob' test in Miri on macOS
Due to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121950, Miri will sometimes complain about this test on macOS. Better disable the test, as otherwise it can fail for unrelated PRs.
r? ``@joboet``
Update E0517 message to reflect RFC 2195.
E0517 occurs when a `#[repr(..)]` attribute is placed on an unsupported item. Currently, the explanation of the error implies that `#[repr(u*/i*)]` cannot be placed on fieldful enums, which is no longer the case since [RFC 2195](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2195) was [stabilized](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/60553), which allows placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` and/or `#[repr(C)]` on fieldful enums to produce a defined layout.
This PR doesn't (currently) add a description of the semantics of placing `#[repr(u*/i*)]` on a fieldful enum to the error explanation, it just removes the claims/implications that it is not allowed.
Mark `{f32,f64}::{next_up,next_down,midpoint}` inline
Most float functions are marked `#[inline]` so any float symbols used by these functions only need to be provided if the function itself is used. RFL recently noticed that `next_up`, `next_down`, and `midpoint` for `f32` and `f64` are not inline, which causes linker errors when building with certain configurations <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240806150619.192882-1-ojeda@kernel.org/>.
Add the missing attributes so the symbols should no longer be required.
