With a patch applied to count the number of unifications,
and running the query `Option<T>, (T -> U) -> Option<U>`
before: performed unifyFunctionType on 17484 functions
after: performed unifyFunctionType on 3055 functions
Avoid more rustc rebuilds in cross-compilation scenarios
This is a continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145874.
It adds a `compiler_for_std` function, which is a slimmed down version of `compiler_for`, which is much simpler, and designed to be used only for the standard library.
The build, dist and doc steps somtimes work with a stage2 std for a given target. That currently requires building a stage2 host compiler. However, if we uplift the stage1 libstd anyway, that is wasteful, in particular when we are cross-compiling.
The last two commits progressively make the stage 2 host rustc build avoidance more and more aggressive. I think that if we decide that it is fine to ship stage1 libstd everywhere, then it makes sense to go all the way.
When we ship stuff, we always build it with the stage 1 compiler (e.g. we ship stage 2 rustc which is built with stage 1 rustc). Libstd is the only component where stage N is built with the stage N compiler. So I think that shipping stage 1 libstd is "enough", and we could thus optimize what gets built on CI.
r? `@jieyouxu`
compiletest: Reduce the number of `println!` calls that don't have access to `TestCx`
In order to stop using `#![feature(internal_output_capture)]` in compiletest, we need to be able to capture the console output of individual tests run by the executor.
The approach I have planned is to have all test runners print “console” output into a trait object that is passed around as part of `TestCx`, since almost all test-runner code has easy access to that context. So `println!("foo")` will become `writeln!(self.stdout, "foo")`, and so on.
In order to make that viable, we need to avoid unnecessary printing in places that don't have easy access to `TestCx`. To do so, we can either get rid of unnecessary print statements, or rearrange the code to make the context available. This PR uses both approaches.
r? jieyouxu
Rehome 30 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/` [#2 of Batch #2]
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that `@Kivooeo` was using.
r? `@jieyouxu`
Rehome 30 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/` [#1 of Batch #2]
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that `@Kivooeo` was using.
r? `@jieyouxu`
I.e. the type definition, then a single inherent `impl` block, then the
trait `impl` blocks.
The lack of sensible ordering here has bugged me for some time.
This appears to have been leftover debugging code.
If the capture information turns out to have still been useful, we can find a
way to emit it in a way that doesn't interfere with overhauling compiletests's
output capture system.
The code in this module is always called in the context of running an
individual tests, and sometimes prints output that needs to be captured.
Moving this module into `runtest` will make it easier to find and audit all of
the print statements that need to be updated when overhauling output-capture.
Running `./x --verbose` will still print out the command-line arguments, and
setting `RUST_LOG=compiletest` will now log the full config instead of a
subset.
Remove TmpLayout in layout_of_enum
09a3846 from <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103693> made LayoutData be owned instead of interned in `Variants::Multiple::variants`[^1], so there's no need for `TmpLayout` in layout_of_enum anymore, and we can just store the variants' layouts directly in the prospective `LayoutData`s' `variants` fields.
This should have no effect on semantics or layout.
(written as part of rust-lang/rust#145337 but not related to the layout optimizations in that PR)
[^1]: see line 1154 of `compiler/rustc_target/src/abi/mod.rs` in the linked commit; `Variants::Multiple::variants` effectively changed from `IndexVec<.., Layout<'tcx>>` to `IndexVec<.., LayoutData>` where the `LayoutData`s are not interned as `Layout`s (`LayoutData` was at the time called `LayoutS`)
fix(std): Fix undefined reference to __my_thread_exit on QNX 8.0
When cross-compiling for the x86_64/aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx800 target (QNX SDP 8.0), the build fails during the final link stage with the error:
```
error: linking with `qcc` failed: exit status: 1
...
= note: undefined reference to `__my_thread_exit'
```
- **On QNX 7.1**: The __my_thread_exit symbol is defined and exported by the main C library (libc.a/libc.so). The std backtrace code can therefore successfully take its address at compile time.
- **On QNX 8.0**: As part of a toolchain modernization, this symbol has been refactored. It is no longer present in any of the standard system libraries (.a or .so).
This patch addresses the problem at its source by conditionally compiling the problematic code.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#142726
Switch next solver to use a specific associated type for trait def id
The compiler just puts `DefId` in there, but rust-analyzer uses different types for each kind of item.
See [the Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/185405-t-compiler.2Frust-analyzer/topic/Implmentating.20New.20Trait.20Solver/near/534329794). In short, it will be a tremendous help to r-a to use specific associated types, while for the solver and the compiler it's a small change. So I ported `TraitId`, as a proof of concept and it's also likely the most impactful.
r? types
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142472 (Add new `doc(attribute = "...")` attribute)
- rust-lang/rust#145368 (CFI: Make `lto` and `linker-plugin-lto` work the same for `compiler_builtins`)
- rust-lang/rust#145853 (Improve error messages around invalid literals in attribute arguments)
- rust-lang/rust#145920 (bootstrap: Explicitly mark the end of a failed test's captured output)
- rust-lang/rust#145937 (add doc-hidden to exports in attribute prelude)
- rust-lang/rust#145965 (Move exporting of profiler and sanitizer symbols to the LLVM backend)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Move exporting of profiler and sanitizer symbols to the LLVM backend
Only the LLVM backend needs those specific symbols exported and it only needs them to be exported for LTO, not from cdylibs in general.
bootstrap: Explicitly mark the end of a failed test's captured output
While working on some compiletest stuff, I noticed that when bootstrap prints a failed test's captured output, there's no indication of where that output actually ends.
In addition to indicating where the captured output ends, this end marker also makes it easier to see the relevant test name when scrolling upwards in terminal output.
Improve error messages around invalid literals in attribute arguments
r? `@jdonszelmann`
This previously created two errors, which is a bit ugly and the second one didn't add any value
Blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143193
CFI: Make `lto` and `linker-plugin-lto` work the same for `compiler_builtins`
Fixrust-lang/rust#142284 by ensuring that `#![no_builtins]` crates can still emit bitcode when proper (i.e., non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto) is used.
Add new `doc(attribute = "...")` attribute
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141123.
The implementation and purpose of this new `#[doc(attribute = "...")]` attribute is very close to `#[doc(keyword = "...")]`. Which means that luckily for us, most of the code needed was already in place and `@Noratrieb` nicely wrote a first draft that helped me implement this new attribute very fast.
Now with all this said, there is one thing I didn't do yet: adding a `rustdoc-js-std` test. I added GUI tests with search results for attributes so should be fine but I still plan on adding one for it once documentation for builtin attributes will be written into the core/std libs.
You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/doc-attribute-attribute/foo/index.html).
cc `@Noratrieb` `@Veykril`
Don't export them from cdylibs. There is no need to do so and it
complicates exported_non_generic_symbols. In addition the GCC backend
likely uses different symbols and may potentially not even need us to
explicitly tell it to export the symbols it needs.
When determining if a trait has no entries for the purposes of omitting vptrs from subtrait vtables, consider its transitive supertraits' entries, instead of just its own entries.
When determining if a non-first supertrait vptr can be omitted from a subtrait vtable, check if the supertrait or any of its (transitive) supertraits have methods, instead of only checking if the supertrait itself has methods.
This fixes the soundness issue where a vptr would be omitted for a supertrait with no methods but that itself had a supertrait with methods, while still optimizing the case where the supertrait is "truly" empty (it has no own vtable entries, and none of its (transitive) supertraits have any own vtable entries).
Fixes <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145752>
-----
Old description:
~~Treat all non-auto traits as non-empty (possibly having methods) for purposes of determining if we need to emit a vptr for a non-direct supertrait (and for new "sibling" entries after a direct or non-direct supertrait).~~
This fixes (I believe) the soundness issue, ~~but regresses vtable sizes and possibly upcasting perf in some cases when using trait hierarchies with empty non-auto traits (see `tests/ui/traits/vtable/multiple-markers.stderr`) since we use vptrs in some cases where we could re-use the vtable.~~
Fixes <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145752>
Re-opens (not anymore) <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114942>
Should not affect <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131813> (i.e. the soundness issue is still fixed, ~~though the relevant vtables in the `trait Evil` example will be larger now~~)
cc implementation history <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131864> <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113856>
-----
~~It should be possible to check if a trait has any methods from itself *or* supertraits (instead of just from itself), but to fix the immediate soundness issue, just assume any non-auto trait could have methods. A more optimistic check can be implemented later (or if someone does it soon it could just supercede this PR 😄).~~ Done in latest push
`@rustbot` label A-dyn-trait F-trait_upcasting
`const`ify (the unstable) `str::as_str`
Tracking issue: rust-lang/rust#130366
The method was not initially marked `const` presumably because it is only useful with `Deref`. But now that const traits seem to be a thing that can actually become real, why not make it `const`?
PR `const`ifying `Deref`: rust-lang/rust#145279
