switch to the default implementation of `write_vectored`
HermitOS doesn't support write_vectored and switch to the default implementation of `write_vectored`.
Update books
## rust-lang/book
8 commits in bebcf527e67755a989a1739b7cfaa8f0e6b30040..5e9051f71638aa941cd5dda465e25c61cde9594f
2024-05-16 14:58:56 UTC to 2024-05-07 23:58:22 UTC
- Convert ch01-03-hello-cargo.md Listing 1-2 using `<Listing>` (rust-lang/book#3924)
- infra: fix rendering bug in mdbook-trpl-note (rust-lang/book#3925)
- infra: support `Listing`s without `file-name` (rust-lang/book#3920)
- Add a `<Listing>` preprocessor (rust-lang/book#3918)
- Update explanation according to code listing (rust-lang/book#3916)
- infra: run package tests (rust-lang/book#3915)
- Fix workspace behavior by excluding `listings` (rust-lang/book#3914)
- Backport changes to chapter 8 (rust-lang/book#3913)
## rust-embedded/book
1 commits in 17842ebb050f62e40a4618edeb8e8ee86e758707..dd962bb82865a5284f2404e5234f1e3222b9c022
2024-05-17 23:43:59 UTC to 2024-05-17 23:43:59 UTC
- 'llvm-tools-preview' component is now named 'llvm-tools' (rust-embedded/book#372)
## rust-lang/reference
2 commits in 51817951d0d213a0011f82b62aae02c3b3f2472e..e356977fceaa8591c762312d8d446769166d4b3e
2024-05-10 12:49:15 UTC to 2024-05-07 13:32:57 UTC
- Document inline const/const block expression (rust-lang/reference#1295)
- patterns: include yet unstable exclusive range patterns (rust-lang/reference#1484)
## rust-lang/rust-by-example
7 commits in 229ad13b64d919b12e548d560f06d88963b25cd3..20482893d1a502df72f76762c97aed88854cdf81
2024-05-20 14:36:21 UTC to 2024-05-14 16:17:03 UTC
- Clarify interchangability for From and Into (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1851)
- Update ja.po based on the latest master (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1850)
- Add explicit section link (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1847)
- Adjust translation build on CI (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1849)
- Update mdbook version in CI (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1848)
- Fix some broken links in ja.po (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1844)
- Fix an external link to absolute (rust-lang/rust-by-example#1842)
## rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide
8 commits in 2d1947ff34d50ca46dfe242ad75531a4c429bb52..b6d4a4940bab85cc91eec70cc2e3096dd48da62d
2024-05-17 17:04:58 UTC to 2024-05-09 13:22:03 UTC
- Add a high level explanation of early/late bound params (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1982)
- Fix broken link to "Lowering" (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1981)
- Broken link fix (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1980)
- Add note about how to pick up abandoned PRs (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1977)
- Toc here is overkill (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1976)
- Link to lint `L-*` labels (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1975)
- Update the rustc_interface examples for current rustc (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1974)
- Edit `Parameter Environments`'s url as it has been edited in #1953 (rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide#1973)
track cycle participants per root
The search graph may have multiple roots, e.g. in
```
A :- B
B :- A, C
C :- D
D :- C
```
we first encounter the `A -> B -> A` cycle which causes `A` to be a root. We then later encounter the `C -> D -> C` cycle as a nested goal of `B`. This cycle is completely separate and `C` will get moved to the global cache. This previously caused us to use `[B, D]` as the `cycle_participants` for `C` and `[]` for `A`.
split off from #125167 as I would like to merge this change separately and will rebase that PR on top of this one. There is no test for this issue and I don't quite know how to write one. It is probably worth it to generalize the search graph to enable us to write unit tests for it.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fix `read_exact` and `read_buf_exact` for `&[u8]` and `io:Cursor`
- Drain after `read_exact` and `read_buf_exact`
- Append to cursor in `read_buf_exact`
Note for E0599 if shadowed bindings has the method.
implement #123558
Use a visitor to find earlier shadowed bingings which has the method.
r? ``@estebank``
Remove libc from MSVC targets
``@ChrisDenton`` started working on a project to remove libc from Windows MSVC targets. I'm completing that work here.
The primary change is to cfg out the dependency in `library/`. And then there's a lot of test patching. Happy to separate this more if people want.
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125237)
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@fmease` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124800
cc `@epage` `@weihanglo`
coverage: Memoize and simplify counter expressions
When creating coverage counter expressions as part of coverage instrumentation, we often end up creating obviously-redundant expressions like `c1 + (c0 - c1)`, which is equivalent to just `c0`.
To avoid doing so, this PR checks when we would create an expression matching one of 5 patterns, and uses the simplified form instead:
- `(a - b) + b` → `a`.
- `(a + b) - b` → `a`.
- `(a + b) - a` → `b`.
- `a + (b - a)` → `b`.
- `a - (a - b)` → `b`.
Of all the different ways to combine 3 operands and 2 operators, these are the patterns that allow simplification.
(Some of those patterns currently don't occur in practice, but are included anyway for completeness, to avoid having to add them later as branch coverage and MC/DC coverage support expands.)
---
This PR also adds memoization for newly-created (or newly-simplified) counter expressions, to avoid creating duplicates.
This currently makes no difference to the final mappings, but is expected to be useful for MC/DC coverage of match expressions, as proposed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/124278#issuecomment-2106754753.
Suggest setting lifetime in borrowck error involving types with elided lifetimes
```
error: lifetime may not live long enough
--> $DIR/ex3-both-anon-regions-both-are-structs-2.rs:7:5
|
LL | fn foo(mut x: Ref, y: Ref) {
| ----- - has type `Ref<'_, '1>`
| |
| has type `Ref<'_, '2>`
LL | x.b = y.b;
| ^^^^^^^^^ assignment requires that `'1` must outlive `'2`
|
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
LL | fn foo<'a>(mut x: Ref<'a, 'a>, y: Ref<'a, 'a>) {
| ++++ ++++++++ ++++++++
```
As can be seen above, it currently doesn't try to compare the `ty::Ty` lifetimes that diverged vs the `hir::Ty` to correctly suggest the following
```
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
LL | fn foo<'a>(mut x: Ref<'_, 'a>, y: Ref<'_, 'a>) {
| ++++ ++++++++ ++++++++
```
but I believe this to still be an improvement over the status quo.
Fix#40990.
Remove unnecessary -fembed-bitcode usage now that it's deprecated
This is a partial revert of 6d819a4b8f because https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/812 removed this flag entirely, meaning we shouldn't have to pass this manually anymore
Fix `tests/debuginfo/strings-and-strs`.
It fails on my machine because it embeds pointer addresses in the expected output.
This commit replaces the addresses with `0x[...]`.
r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
Make `EvalCtxt` generic over `InferCtxtLike`
...but don't change any of the impls, yet! These can get uplifted as we add more methods to `InferCtxtLike`/`Interner` :3
This is built on top of #125230.
r? lcnr
defrost `RUST_MIN_STACK=ice rustc hello.rs`
I didn't think too hard about testing my previous PR rust-lang/rust#122847 which makes our stack overflow handler assist people in discovering the `RUST_MIN_STACK` variable (which apparently is surprisingly useful for Really Big codebases). After it was merged, some useful comments left in a drive-by review led me to discover I had added an ICE. This reworks the code a bit to explain the rationale, remove the ICE that I introduced, and properly test one of the diagnostics.
fix suggestion in E0373 for !Unpin coroutines
Coroutines can be prefixed with the `static` keyword to make them
`!Unpin`.
However, given the following function:
```rust
fn check() -> impl Sized {
let x = 0;
#[coroutine]
static || {
yield;
x
}
}
```
We currently suggest prefixing `move` before `static`, which is
syntactically incorrect:
```
error[E0373]: coroutine may outlive the current function, but it borrows
...
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | static || {
| ^^^^^^^^^ may outlive borrowed value `x`
7 | yield;
8 | x
| - `x` is borrowed here
|
note: coroutine is returned here
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | / static || {
7 | | yield;
8 | | x
9 | | }
| |_____^
help: to force the coroutine to take ownership of `x` (and any other
referenced variables), use the `move` keyword
| // this is syntactically incorrect, it should be `static move ||`
6 | move static || {
| ++++
```
This PR suggests adding `move` after `static` for these coroutines.
I also added a UI test for this case.
