Commit graph

1024 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Rheinsberg
7b9e1a95f0 test/codegen: test inter-crate linkage with static relocation
Add a codegen-test that verifies inter-crate linkage with the static
relocation model. We expect all symbols that are part of a rust
compilation to end up in the same DSO, thus we expect `dso_local`
annotations.
2022-11-29 11:21:16 +01:00
bors
faf1891deb Auto merge of #104818 - scottmcm:refactor-extend-func, r=the8472
Stop peeling the last iteration of the loop in `Vec::resize_with`

`resize_with` uses the `ExtendWith` code that peels the last iteration:
341d8b8a2c/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs (L2525-L2529)

But that's kinda weird for `ExtendFunc` because it does the same thing on the last iteration anyway:
341d8b8a2c/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs (L2494-L2502)

So this just has it use the normal `extend`-from-`TrustedLen` code instead.

r? `@ghost`
2022-11-27 00:58:50 +00:00
bors
8841bee954 Auto merge of #103556 - clubby789:specialize-option-partial-eq, r=scottmcm
Manually implement PartialEq for Option<T> and specialize non-nullable types

This PR manually implements `PartialEq` and `StructuralPartialEq` for `Option`, which seems to produce slightly better codegen than the automatically derived implementation.

It also allows specializing on the `core::num::NonZero*` and `core::ptr::NonNull` types, taking advantage of the niche optimization by transmuting the `Option<T>` to `T` to be compared directly, which can be done in just two instructions.

A comparison of the original, new and specialized code generation is available [here](https://godbolt.org/z/dE4jxdYsa).
2022-11-26 08:56:20 +00:00
Scott McMurray
9d68a1a74c Tune RepeatWith::try_fold and Take::for_each and Vec::extend_trusted 2022-11-24 19:14:19 -08:00
Arpad Borsos
9f36f988ad
Avoid GenFuture shim when compiling async constructs
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.

The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.

The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
2022-11-24 10:04:27 +01:00
The 8472
a9128d8927 fix tests, update size asserts 2022-11-22 23:12:26 +01:00
Yuki Okushi
785237d392
Rollup merge of #104435 - scottmcm:iter-repeat-n, r=thomcc
`VecDeque::resize` should re-use the buffer in the passed-in element

Today it always copies it for *every* appended element, but one of those clones is avoidable.

This adds `iter::repeat_n` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104434) as the primitive needed to do this.  If this PR is acceptable, I'll also use this in `Vec` rather than its custom `ExtendElement` type & infrastructure that is harder to share between multiple different containers:

101e1822c3/library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs (L2479-L2492)
2022-11-20 13:15:59 +09:00
Manish Goregaokar
e2301154e3
Rollup merge of #103456 - scottmcm:fix-unchecked-shifts, r=scottmcm
`unchecked_{shl|shr}` should use `u32` as the RHS

The other shift methods, such as https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/primitive.u64.html#method.checked_shr and https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/primitive.i16.html#method.wrapping_shl, use `u32` for the shift amount.  That's consistent with other things, like `count_ones`, which also always use `u32` for a bit count, regardless of the size of the type.

This PR changes `unchecked_shl` and `unchecked_shr` to also use `u32` for the shift amount (rather than Self).

cc #85122, the `unchecked_math` tracking issue
2022-11-18 17:48:17 -05:00
Scott McMurray
9d4b1f98e6 Ignore the unchecked-shifts codegen test in debug-assertions builds 2022-11-16 15:58:43 -08:00
Scott McMurray
d62b903892 VecDeque::resize should re-use the buffer in the passed-in element
Today it always copies it for *every* appended element, but one of those clones is avoidable.
2022-11-15 00:53:26 -08:00
Michael Benfield
51918dcc51 rustc_codegen_ssa: Better code generation for niche discriminants.
In some cases we can avoid arithmetic before checking whether a niche
represents an untagged variant.

This is relevant to #101872
2022-11-11 05:54:30 +00:00
Manish Goregaokar
8f2c1f8469
Rollup merge of #104077 - nicholasbishop:bishop-uefi-aapcs, r=nagisa
Use aapcs for efiapi calling convention on arm

On arm, [llvm treats the C calling convention as `aapcs` on soft-float targets and `aapcs-vfp` on hard-float targets](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/issues/116#issuecomment-261057422). UEFI specifies in the arm calling convention that [floating point extensions aren't used](https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/02_Overview.html#detailed-calling-convention), so always translate `efiapi` to `aapcs` on arm.

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65815
2022-11-10 10:47:39 -05:00
Manish Goregaokar
7521a974d3
Rollup merge of #103353 - wesleywiser:fix_lld_thinlto_msvc, r=michaelwoerister
Fix Access Violation when using lld & ThinLTO on windows-msvc

Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage pointer value.

If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see what is happening:

*lib.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2  notype       External     | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

*bin.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF  notype       External     | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result, linking the files generates a warning from lld:

> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]

and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.

To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern item in LLVM IR.

Fixes #81408
2022-11-08 21:03:52 -05:00
Nicholas Bishop
42cbb40157 Use aapcs for efiapi calling convention on arm
On arm, llvm treats the C calling convention as `aapcs` on soft-float
targets and `aapcs-vfp` on hard-float targets [1]. UEFI specifies in the
arm calling convention that floating point extensions aren't used [2],
so always translate `efiapi` to `aapcs` on arm.

[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/issues/116#issuecomment-261057422
[2]: https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/02_Overview.html#detailed-calling-convention

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65815
2022-11-06 18:05:24 -05:00
Michael Goulet
ff8f84ccf6 Bless more tests 2022-11-05 18:05:45 +00:00
Tim Neumann
c15cfc91c4 LLVM 16: Switch to using MemoryEffects 2022-11-04 17:58:16 +00:00
Wesley Wiser
296489c892 Fix Access Violation when using lld & ThinLTO on windows-msvc
Users report an AV at runtime of the compiled binary when using lld and
ThinLTO on windows-msvc. The AV occurs when accessing a static value
which is defined in one crate but used in another. Based on the
disassembly of the cross-crate use, it appears that the use is not
correctly linked with the definition and is instead assigned a garbage
pointer value.

If we look at the symbol tables for each crates' obj file, we can see
what is happening:

*lib.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
00E 00000000 SECT2  notype       External     | _ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

*bin.obj*:

```
COFF SYMBOL TABLE
...
010 00000000 UNDEF  notype       External     | __imp__ZN10reproducer7memrchr2FN17h612b61ca0e168901E
...
```

The use of the symbol has the "import" style symbol name but the
declaration doesn't generate any symbol with the same name. As a result,
linking the files generates a warning from lld:

> rust-lld: warning: bin.obj: locally defined symbol imported: reproducer::memrchr::FN::h612b61ca0e168901 (defined in lib.obj) [LNK4217]

and the symbol reference remains undefined at runtime leading to the AV.

To fix this, we just need to detect that we are performing ThinLTO (and
thus, static linking) and omit the `dllimport` attribute on the extern
item in LLVM IR.
2022-11-03 11:17:42 -04:00
Wesley Wiser
cf6efe8137 Add test case 2022-11-03 11:17:42 -04:00
clubby789
8e8fd02b27 Specialize PartialEq for Option<num::NonZero*> and Option<ptr::NonNull> 2022-10-31 16:43:31 +00:00
ouz-a
a1672ad5b8 Remove bounds check with enum cast 2022-10-31 14:10:37 +03:00
Nicholas Nethercote
003a3f8cd3 Use br instead of switch in more cases.
`codegen_switchint_terminator` already uses `br` instead of `switch`
when there is one normal target plus the `otherwise` target. But there's
another common case with two normal targets and an `otherwise` target
that points to an empty unreachable BB. This comes up a lot when
switching on the tags of enums that use niches.

The pattern looks like this:
```
bb1:                                              ; preds = %bb6
  %3 = load i8, ptr %_2, align 1, !range !9, !noundef !4
  %4 = sub i8 %3, 2
  %5 = icmp eq i8 %4, 0
  %_6 = select i1 %5, i64 0, i64 1
  switch i64 %_6, label %bb3 [
    i64 0, label %bb4
    i64 1, label %bb2
  ]

bb3:                                              ; preds = %bb1
  unreachable
```
This commit adds code to convert the `switch` to a `br`:
```
bb1:                                              ; preds = %bb6
  %3 = load i8, ptr %_2, align 1, !range !9, !noundef !4
  %4 = sub i8 %3, 2
  %5 = icmp eq i8 %4, 0
  %_6 = select i1 %5, i64 0, i64 1
  %6 = icmp eq i64 %_6, 0
  br i1 %6, label %bb4, label %bb2

bb3:                                              ; No predecessors!
  unreachable
```
This has a surprisingly large effect on compile times, with reductions
of 5% on debug builds of some crates. The reduction is all due to LLVM
taking less time. Maybe LLVM is just much better at handling `br` than
`switch`.

The resulting code is still suboptimal.
- The `icmp`, `select`, `icmp` sequence is silly, converting an `i1` to an `i64`
  and back to an `i1`. But with the current code structure it's hard to avoid,
  and LLVM will easily clean it up, in opt builds at least.
- `bb3` is usually now truly dead code (though not always, so it can't
  be removed universally).
2022-10-31 10:16:39 +11:00
bors
f42b6fa7ca Auto merge of #103299 - nikic:usub-overflow, r=wesleywiser
Don't use usub.with.overflow intrinsic

The canonical form of a usub.with.overflow check in LLVM are separate sub + icmp instructions, rather than a usub.with.overflow intrinsic. Using usub.with.overflow will generally result in worse optimization potential.

The backend will attempt to form usub.with.overflow when it comes to actual instruction selection. This is not fully reliable, but I believe this is a better tradeoff than using the intrinsic in IR.

Fixes #103285.
2022-10-30 17:45:04 +00:00
bors
77e7b74ad5 Auto merge of #103071 - wesleywiser:fix_inlined_line_numbers, r=davidtwco
Fix line numbers for MIR inlined code

`should_collapse_debuginfo` detects if the specified span is part of a
macro expansion however it does this by checking if the span is anything
other than a normal (non-expanded) kind, then the span sequence is
walked backwards to the root span.

This doesn't work when the MIR inliner inlines code as it creates spans
with expansion information set to `ExprKind::Inlined` and results in the
line number being attributed to the inline callsite rather than the
normal line number of the inlined code.

Fixes #103068
2022-10-28 16:27:56 +00:00
Scott McMurray
3b16c04676 unchecked_{shl|shr} should use u32 as the RHS 2022-10-23 17:32:36 -07:00
Patrick Walton
da630ac79d Introduce deduced parameter attributes, and use them for deducing readonly on
indirect immutable freeze by-value function parameters.

Right now, `rustc` only examines function signatures and the platform ABI when
determining the LLVM attributes to apply to parameters. This results in missed
optimizations, because there are some attributes that can be determined via
analysis of the MIR making up the function body. In particular, `readonly`
could be applied to most indirectly-passed by-value function arguments
(specifically, those that are freeze and are observed not to be mutated), but
it currently is not.

This patch introduces the machinery that allows `rustc` to determine those
attributes. It consists of a query, `deduced_param_attrs`, that, when
evaluated, analyzes the MIR of the function to determine supplementary
attributes. The results of this query for each function are written into the
crate metadata so that the deduced parameter attributes can be applied to
cross-crate functions. In this patch, we simply check the parameter for
mutations to determine whether the `readonly` attribute should be applied to
parameters that are indirect immutable freeze by-value.  More attributes could
conceivably be deduced in the future: `nocapture` and `noalias` come to mind.

Adding `readonly` to indirect function parameters where applicable enables some
potential optimizations in LLVM that are discussed in [issue 103103] and [PR
103070] around avoiding stack-to-stack memory copies that appear in functions
like `core::fmt::Write::write_fmt` and `core::panicking::assert_failed`. These
functions pass a large structure unchanged by value to a subfunction that also
doesn't mutate it. Since the structure in this case is passed as an indirect
parameter, it's a pointer from LLVM's perspective. As a result, the
intermediate copy of the structure that our codegen emits could be optimized
away by LLVM's MemCpyOptimizer if it knew that the pointer is `readonly
nocapture noalias` in both the caller and callee. We already pass `nocapture
noalias`, but we're missing `readonly`, as we can't determine whether a
by-value parameter is mutated by examining the signature in Rust. I didn't have
much success with having LLVM infer the `readonly` attribute, even with fat
LTO; it seems that deducing it at the MIR level is necessary.

No large benefits should be expected from this optimization *now*; LLVM needs
some changes (discussed in [PR 103070]) to more aggressively use the `noalias
nocapture readonly` combination in its alias analysis. I have some LLVM patches
for these optimizations and have had them looked over. With all the patches
applied locally, I enabled LLVM to remove all the `memcpy`s from the following
code:

```rust
fn main() {
    println!("Hello {}", 3);
}
```

which is a significant codegen improvement over the status quo. I expect that
if this optimization kicks in in multiple places even for such a simple
program, then it will apply to Rust code all over the place.

[issue 103103]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103103

[PR 103070]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103070
2022-10-21 02:33:15 -07:00
Nikita Popov
783301298f Don't use usub.with.overflow intrinsic
The canonical form of a usub.with.overflow check in LLVM are
separate sub + icmp instructions, rather than a usub.with.overflow
intrinsic. Using usub.with.overflow will generally result in worse
optimization potential.

The backend will attempt to form usub.with.overflow when it comes
to actual instruction selection. This is not fully reliable, but
I believe this is a better tradeoff than using the intrinsic in
IR.

Fixes #103285.
2022-10-20 12:47:17 +02:00
Wesley Wiser
34d90a46da Fix line numbers for MIR inlined code
`should_collapse_debuginfo` detects if the specified span is part of a
macro expansion however it does this by checking if the span is anything
other than a normal (non-expanded) kind, then the span sequence is
walked backwards to the root span.

This doesn't work when the MIR inliner inlines code as it creates spans
with expansion information set to `ExprKind::Inlined` and results in the
line number being attributed to the inline callsite rather than the
normal line number of the inlined code.
2022-10-14 18:44:30 -04:00
Wesley Wiser
9363a1401e Add test case for MIR inlining debuginfo line numbers 2022-10-14 14:09:30 -04:00
Rageking8
7122abaddf more dupe word typos 2022-10-14 12:57:56 +08:00
bors
365578445c Auto merge of #102724 - pcc:scs-fix-test, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Fix the sanitizer_scs_attr_check.rs test

The test is failing when targeting aarch64 Android. The intent appears to have been to look for a function attributes comment (or the absence of one) on the line preceding the function declaration. But this isn't quite possible with FileCheck and the test as written was looking for a line with `no_scs` after a line with `scs`, which doesn't appear in the output. Instead, match on the function attributes comment on the line following the demangled function name comment.
2022-10-11 04:27:13 +00:00
bors
a6b7274a46 Auto merge of #102596 - scottmcm:option-bool-calloc, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Do the `calloc` optimization for `Option<bool>`

Inspired by <https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/xtiqj8/why_is_this_functional_version_faster_than_my_for/iqqy37b/>.
2022-10-10 18:42:40 +00:00
Ralf Jung
6f6433428f add a few more assert_unsafe_precondition 2022-10-07 14:35:12 +02:00
Peter Collingbourne
5f3a4240c5 Fix the sanitizer_scs_attr_check.rs test
The test is failing when targeting aarch64 Android. The intent appears
to have been to look for a function attributes comment (or the absence
of one) on the line preceding the function declaration. But this isn't
quite possible with FileCheck and the test as written was looking for a
line with `no_scs` after a line with `scs`, which doesn't appear in the
output. Instead, match on the function attributes comment on the line
following the demangled function name comment.
2022-10-05 21:55:24 -07:00
bors
607b8296e0 Auto merge of #102503 - cuviper:x86-stack-probes, r=nagisa
Enable inline stack probes on X86 with LLVM 16

The known problems with x86 inline-asm stack probes have been solved on LLVM main (16), so this flips the switch. Anyone using bleeding-edge LLVM with rustc can start testing this, as I have done locally. We'll get more direct rust-ci when LLVM 16 branches and we start our upgrade, and we can always patch or disable it then if we find new problems.

The previous attempt was #77885, reverted in #84708.
2022-10-03 02:09:05 +00:00
Scott McMurray
31cd0aa823 Do the calloc optimization for Option<bool>
Inspired by <https://old.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/xtiqj8/why_is_this_functional_version_faster_than_my_for/iqqy37b/>.
2022-10-02 12:26:58 -07:00
bors
c2590e6e89 Auto merge of #102535 - scottmcm:optimize-split-at-partition-point, r=thomcc
Tell LLVM that `partition_point` returns a valid fencepost

This was already done for a successful `binary_search`, but this way `partition_point` can get similar optimizations.

Demonstration that nightly can't do this optimization today, and leaves in the panicking path: <https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=e1074cd2faf5f68e49cffd728ded243a>

r? `@thomcc`
2022-10-02 07:11:15 +00:00
bors
47b2eee173 Auto merge of #102424 - sunfishcode:sunfishcode/hidden-main, r=nagisa
Declare `main` as visibility hidden on targets that default to hidden.

On targets with `default_hidden_visibility` set, which is currrently just WebAssembly, declare the generated `main` function with visibility hidden. This makes it consistent with clang's WebAssembly target, where `main` is just a user function that gets the same visibility as any other user function, which is hidden on WebAssembly unless explicitly overridden.

This will help simplify use cases which in the future may want to automatically wasm-export all visibility-"default" symbols. `main` isn't intended to be wasm-exported, and marking it hidden prevents it from being wasm-exported in that scenario.
2022-10-02 04:12:09 +00:00
Scott McMurray
c7af338e6f Tell LLVM that partition_point returns a valid fencepost
This was already done for a successful `binary_search`, but this way `partition_point` can get similar optimizations.
2022-09-30 23:39:15 -07:00
Dan Gohman
72f15572ee Allow hidden in src/test/codegen/abi-main-signature-32bit-c-int.rs 2022-09-30 14:55:26 -07:00
Josh Stone
ed9e6f2ad8 Enable inline stack probes on X86 with LLVM 16 2022-09-29 19:49:23 -07:00
Josh Stone
ad8f519ed7 Enable inline stack probes on PowerPC and SystemZ 2022-09-26 13:40:24 -07:00
bors
4ecfdfac51 Auto merge of #100214 - scottmcm:strict-range, r=thomcc
Optimize `array::IntoIter`

`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.

This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.

I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.

(`vec::IntoIter` uses pointers instead of indexes, so doesn't have this problem, but that only works because its elements are boxed.  `array::IntoIter` can't use pointers because that would keep it from being movable.)
2022-09-21 00:41:33 +00:00
Scott McMurray
6dbd9a29c2 Optimize array::IntoIter
`.into_iter()` on arrays was slower than it needed to be (especially compared to slice iterator) since it uses `Range<usize>`, which needs to handle degenerate ranges like `10..4`.

This PR adds an internal `IndexRange` type that's like `Range<usize>` but with a safety invariant that means it doesn't need to worry about those cases -- it only handles `start <= end` -- and thus can give LLVM more information to optimize better.

I added one simple demonstration of the improvement as a codegen test.
2022-09-19 23:24:34 -07:00
Scott McMurray
335690200e Add a codegen test for slice::from_ptr_range 2022-09-17 18:54:00 -07:00
bors
95a992a686 Auto merge of #97800 - pnkfelix:issue-97463-fix-aarch64-call-abi-does-not-zeroext, r=wesleywiser
Aarch64 call abi does not zeroext (and one cannot assume it does so)

Fix #97463
2022-09-16 20:08:05 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
c296a489d4 Bless codegen. 2022-09-13 19:18:24 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
7712825cc0 Bless codegen test. 2022-09-13 19:18:24 +02:00
Nicholas Bishop
54d9ba8239 Use RelocModel::Pic for UEFI targets
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100537, the relocation model
for UEFI targets was changed from PIC (the default value) to
static. There was some dicussion of this change here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100537#discussion_r952363012

It turns out that this can cause compilation to fail as described in
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101377, so switch back to PIC.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101377
2022-09-09 15:26:19 -04:00
Nikita Popov
cbf3b2432e Add test for #98294
Add a test to make that the failure condition for this pattern is
optimized away.

Fixes #98294.
2022-09-05 15:24:18 +02:00
bors
b32223fec1 Auto merge of #100707 - dzvon:fix-typo, r=davidtwco
Fix a bunch of typo

This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].

I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.

[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
2022-09-01 05:39:58 +00:00