Test rustdoc js
Add tests for the rustdoc search. It was heavily required because of all the recent breaking changes that happened while I went through improvements in doc search (add search in/for generic search for example).
Fix 45345
There is a fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45345
It re-introduces `CFG_LIBDIR_RELATIVE` which was broken when migration from `configure` script to `x.py`.
Other commits fix errors which happen after rustbuild cleanups.
Bump to 1.25.0
* Bump the release version to 1.25
* Bump the bootstrap compiler to the recent beta
* Allow using unstable rustdoc features on beta - this fix has been applied to
the beta branch but needed to go to the master branch as well.
* Bump the release version to 1.25
* Bump the bootstrap compiler to the recent beta
* Allow using unstable rustdoc features on beta - this fix has been applied to
the beta branch but needed to go to the master branch as well.
rustdoc: add option to abort the process on markdown differences
In the efforts of keeping the std docs free of markdown warnings, this PR adds a stopgap measure to make sure the CI fails if it detects a markdown difference. It does this by adding a new unstable flag to rustdoc, `--deny-render-differences`, which bootstrap then passes to rustdoc when documenting std and friends.
The implementation is... probably not the cleanest option. It currently adds an extra branch after it prints the markdown warnings, which just prints a final line and calls `::std::process::abort(1)`. I did it like this because if it just panics regularly, it looks like an ICE, an even though `html::render::run` returns a Result, that Result is also just `expect`ed immediately, generating the same problem. This way bypasses the panic handler at the top of the thread and looks like a proper failure. Since i don't have a real error Handler there, this is the best i can do without pulling in a real error system for rustdoc.
This PR is blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46853, which will fix the rendering differences that were present on master when i started this branch.
[auto-toolstate] Upload the toolstate result to an external git repository, and removes BuildExpectation
This PR consists of 3 commits.
1. (Steps 4–6) The `toolstate.json` output previously collected is now pushed to the https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rust-toolstate repository.
2. (Step 7) Revert commit ab018c7, thus removing all traces of `BuildExpectation` and `toolstate.toml`.
3. (Step 8) Adjust CONTRIBUTION.md for the new procedure.
These are the last steps of #45861. After this PR, the toolstate will be automatically computed and published to https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/rust-toolstate/. There is no need to manage toolstate.toml again.
Closes#45861.
This reverts commit ab018c76e1.
This also adds the `ToolBuild::is_ext_tool` field to replace the previous
`ToolBuild::expectation` field, to indicate whether a build-failure of
certain tool is essential.
Re-do the FreeBSD cross-builds to use Clang and libc++. Fixes#44433
Reviving #45077, from @jld:
> The main goal here is to use FreeBSD's normal libc++, instead of
> statically linking the libstdc++ packaged with GCC, because that
> libstdc++ has bugs that cause rustc to deadlock inside LLVM.
>
> But the easiest way to use libc++ is to switch the build from GCC to
> Clang, and the Clang package in the Ubuntu image already knows how to
> cross-compile (given a sysroot and preferably cross-binutils), so the
> toolchain script now uses that instead of building a custom compiler.
>
> This also de-duplicates the build-toolchain.sh script.
#45077 was close but didn't quite make it. I rebased @jld's work off the current `master` and started with that.
I was able to determine that this Travis error (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45077#issuecomment-336029862) was ultimately caused by `src/librustc_llvm/build.rs` attempting to follow a wrong value in `LLVM_STATIC_STDCPP` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45077#issuecomment-352639456).
I looked at the downstream port for FreeBSD (https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/lang/rust/) and it seems like they do not use `--enable-llvm-static-stdcpp`.
Since `libc++` is included in the FreeBSD 10+ base system, we don't need to statically link it either?
So in b989428f7d I have set the FreeBSD build to not actually use `LLVM_STATIC_STDCPP`.
I was able to run `./src/ci/docker/run.sh` with both `dist-i686-freebsd` and `dist-x86_64-freebsd` successfully and in about 1 minute of testing it seemed like the dist-x86_64-freebsd results worked on a FreeBSD 11 system.
It should fix#44433, which seems to be affecting many potential users. Also FreeBSD users should be able to `./x.py build` which should help anyone who wants to upstream fixes for FreeBSD.
Questions:
Does this approach seem to be the right way to go? Do we actually really want to statically link `libc++`? (I tried that here, but it ultimately ran into a roadblock on x86_64: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45077#issuecomment-353293414)
Can we rewrite the comment here to be more clear about why some systems aren't going to actually use this option:
b989428f7d/src/bootstrap/compile.rs (L550-L553)
How does this affect users of older FreeBSD systems? It seemed like no one was complaining about using a 10.3 base version in the thread for #45077. FreeBSD seems to only officially support 10.3, 10.4, and 11.x right now, do we have to consider older users? The `libc++` stuff came in for FreeBSD 10, older FreeBSD used `libstdc++`.
Looks like @alexcrichton was leading the discussion on the previous issue:
r? @alexcrichton
Let me know what I can do to help get this through.
The code inside this conditional will not work on FreeBSD 10+ because
those versions use clang and libc++ rather than libstdc++.
Since FreeBSD comes with libc++ in the base, presumably all 10+ systems
will have it present.
Searching for libstdc++.a will not work if it is not present. As a
result, this would previously have set `LLVM_STATIC_STDCPP=libstdc++.a`,
which isn't a valid path and caused problems later on when building
`librustc_llvm`.
This could possibly be updated in the future to look for `libc++.a` on
FreeBSD, by expanding the code inside the conditional. In one attempt
to run this on x86_64-freebsd, I found that libc++ was not compiled with
PIC, so it failed anyway.
rustbuild: Fix a typo with the Cargo book
The usage of `Path::new` prevented out-of-tree builds (like the bots do) from
working by accident!
Closes#46195
This commit allocates a builder to running wasm32 tests on Travis. Not all test
suites pass right now so this is starting out with just the run-pass and the
libcore test suites. This'll hopefully give us a pretty broad set of coverage
for integration in rustc itself as well as a somewhat broad coverage of the llvm
backend itself through integration/unit tests.
[auto-toolstate][1/8] Always ignore build failure of failable tools (rls, rustfmt, clippy)
If build failed for these tools, they will be automatically skipped from distribution, and will not fail the whole build.
Test failures are *not* ignored, nor build failure of other tools (e.g. cargo). Therefore it should have no observable effect to the current CI system.
This is step 1/8 of automatic management of broken tools #45861. The purpose is concentrate all failure detection about tools into a single CI job for easy management, while keeping the ability to distribute these tools in the nightlies.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
This commit alters how we compile LLVM by default enabling the WebAssembly
backend. This then also adds the wasm32-unknown-unknown target to get compiled
on the `cross` builder and distributed through rustup. Tests are not yet enabled
for this target but that should hopefully be coming soon!
This commit updates LLVM to fix#45511 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D39981) and
also reenables ThinLTO for libtest now that we shouldn't hit #45768. This also
opportunistically enables ThinLTO for libstd which was previously blocked
(#45661) on test failures related to debuginfo with a presumed cause of #45511.
Closes#45511
Allow filtering analysis by reachability
Fixes#43521.
Fixes https://github.com/nrc/rls-analysis/issues/79.
This PR allows a user to filter items present in the save-analysis data by setting the `reachable_only` config option. This option is intended for use by the new rustdoc. The PR isn't quite finished, because it's dependent on a new release of rls-data, but I want to make sure that the approach is valid.
https://github.com/nrc/rls-analysis/issues/79 mentions that `pub use` might need to be handled, but my thinking is that the consumer of the analysis data would be able to infer which imports are `pub use`, and which items are only reachable through `pub use`, so that doesn't need to be handled here.
r? @nrc
