Async drop fix for async_drop_in_place<T> layout for unspecified T
Fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140423.
Layout of `async_drop_in_place<T>::{closure}` is calculated for unspecified T from dataflow_const_prop `try_make_constant`.
`@oli-obk,` do you think, it may be a better solution to add check like `if !args[0].is_fully_specialized() { return None; }` in `fn async_drop_coroutine_layout`?
And could you, pls, recommend, how to implement `is_fully_specialized()` in a most simple way?
Partially stabilize LoongArch target features
Stabilization PR for the LoongArch target features. This PR stabilizes some of the target features tracked by #44839.
Specifically, this PR stabilizes the following target features:
* f
* d
* frecipe
* lasx
* lbt
* lsx
* lvz
Docs PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1707
r? `@Amanieu`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140792 (Use intrinsics for `{f16,f32,f64,f128}::{minimum,maximum}` operations)
- #140795 (Prefer to suggest stable candidates rather than unstable ones)
- #140865 (Make t letter looks like lowercase rather than uppercase)
- #140878 (Two expand-related cleanups)
- #140882 (Split duration_constructors to get non-controversial constructors out)
- #140886 (Update deps of bootstrap for Cygwin)
- #140903 (test intrinsic fallback bodies with Miri)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
test intrinsic fallback bodies with Miri
`@Urgau` noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140792 that fallback bodies our backends don't use are untested... which is correct, and it is a problem. So this adds a testing-only flag to Miri to force the use of fallback bodies, and adds a run of the Miri test suite with that flag to CI. This should not take much more than a minute so I hope it's fine? Let's see how long it actually takes.
While at it, I made that test run also enable MIR optimizations. Miri's CI has a run with that, and it has caught mir-opt bugs in the past -- this way we'd see the CI failure earlier.
r? `@scottmcm`
Update deps of bootstrap for Cygwin
This PR just runs
```
cargo update fd-lock xattr libc errno
```
It reduces dependency on `rustix 0.38.40` and updates `libc` & `errno`. Now it compiles successfully on Cygwin:)
Prefer to suggest stable candidates rather than unstable ones
Fixes#140240
The logic is to replace unstable suggestions if we meet a new stable one, and do nothing if any other situation. In old logic, we just use the first candidate we meet as the suggestion for the same items.
E.g., `std::range::legacy::Range` vs `std::ops::Range`, `legacy` in the former is unstable, we prefer to suggest use the latter.
Use intrinsics for `{f16,f32,f64,f128}::{minimum,maximum}` operations
This PR creates intrinsics for `{f16,f32,f64,f64}::{minimum,maximum}` operations.
This wasn't done when those operations were added as the LLVM support was too weak but now that LLVM has libcalls for unsupported platforms we can finally use them.
Cranelift and GCC[^1] support are partial, Cranelift doesn't support `f16` and `f128`, while GCC doesn't support `f16`.
r? `@tgross35`
try-job: aarch64-gnu
try-job: dist-various-1
try-job: dist-various-2
[^1]: https://www.gnu.org/software///gnulib/manual/html_node/Functions-in-_003cmath_002eh_003e.html
1.87.0 release notes: remove nonsensical `~` operator
There is no `~` unary prefix operator, and it definitely shouldn't be in the release notes for a feature whose introducing PR doesn't test for it (because it doesn't exist). Also fix an unnecessary `}` on the same line.
r? ``@pietroalbini``
remove 'unordered' atomic intrinsics
As their doc comment already indicates, these operations do not currently have a place in our memory model. The intrinsics were introduced to support a hack in compiler-builtins, but that hack recently got removed (see https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/issues/788).
remove intrinsics::drop_in_place
This was only ever accidentally stable, and has been marked as deprecated since Rust 1.52, released almost 4 years ago. We've removed the old serialization `derive`s, maybe we can remove this one as well?
As suggested by ``@jhpratt,`` let's see what crater says for this one.
Implement (part of) ACP 429: add `DerefMut` to `Lazy[Cell/Lock]`
`DerefMut` is instantly stable, as a trait impl. That means this needs an FCP.
``@rustbot`` label +needs-fcp
https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/429
Merge typeck loop with static/const item eval loop
r? `@ghost`
Let's try a small one first. Doing this in general has some bad cache coherence issues because the query caches are laid out in `Vec<QueryResult>` lists per query where each index refers to a `DefId` in the same order as we're iterating. Iterating two or more lists at the same time does have cache issues, so I want to poke a bit at it to see if we can't merge just a few of them at a time.
There is no `~` unary prefix operator, and it definitely shouldn't be in the release notes for a feature whose introducing PR doesn't test for it (because it doesn't exist).
It's a "utility trait to reduce boilerplate" implemented for `P` and
`AstNodeWrapper`, but removing it gives a net reduction of twenty lines
of code. It's also simpler to just implement
`HasNodeId`/`HasAttrs`/`HasTokens` directly on types instead of via
`AstDeref`.
(I decided to make this change when doing some related refactoring and
the error messages involving `AstDeref` and `HasAttrs` were hard to
understand; removing it helped a lot.)
Last minute relnotes fix
This PR applies most of the suggestions in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140802#discussion_r2080675967 (except for `as_flattened_mut`, which is indeed a const stabilization this cycle), and replaces all links from nightly to stable.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Improved error message for top-level or-patterns
I was confused by "top-level or-patterns are not allowed in `let` bindings" error, because it sounded like or-patterns were completely unsupported.
This error has an auto-fix suggestion that shows otherwise, but the auto-fix isn't always visible in IDEs.
I've changed the wording to be consistent with "`Fn` bounds require arguments in parentheses", and it doesn't sound like a dead-end any more.
Fix `broken-pipe-no-ice` run-make test for rpath-less builds
The `broken-pipe-no-ice` run-make test currently fails on rpath-less builds, because host compiler runtime libs are not configured for raw std command usages.
This PR is an alternative approach to #140744. However, instead of duplicating `run_make_support::util::set_host_compiler_dylib_path` logic, we instead support "ejecting" the "configured" underlying std `Command` from `bare_rustc()` and `rustdoc()`, where host compiler runtime libs are already set.
cc `@jchecahi`
r? `@Kobzol`
also export metrics from librustdoc
Addresses the issue mentioned here: [#t-docs-rs > metrics intitiative @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/356853-t-docs-rs/topic/metrics.20intitiative/near/515714331)
The previous implementation only emitted metrics from rustc, but it turns out running `cargo doc` only calls `rustc` for dependencies, and not for the root crate being documented. We are planning to gather a sample dataset from docs.rs ci via `cargo doc` so as things stood this would not emit any metrics for any of the crates themselves that were published.
This change adds the same logic from `rustc_driver_impl` to `librustdoc` to also dump metrics at the end of its execution if they are enabled.
Note: The hash's generated by librustdoc will likely be completely different from the ones generated by rustc. This is because rustc is actually doing the various passes needed to fully calculate the stable version hash. My understanding of how rustdoc works is that the hashes generated will be working with partial information due to it only doing the work required to generate docs. The hashes will still be unique per crate and will work for the purposes of the metrics proof of concept, it would not be possible to correlate metrics generated by rustdoc with those generated by rustc for the same crate. This is fine for the purposes of the PoC but a future full implementation of metrics may want to address this issue.
rustdoc: Replace unstable flag `--doctest-compilation-args` with a simpler one: `--doctest-build-arg`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134172.
Context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137096#issuecomment-2776318800
Yeets the ad hoc shell-like lexer for 'nested' program arguments.
No FCP necessary since the flag is unstable.
I've chosen to replace `compilation` with `build` because it's shorter (you now need to pass it multiple times in order to pass many arguments to the doctest compiler, so it matters a bit) and since I prefer it esthetically.
**Issue**: Even though we don't process the argument passed to `--doctest-build-arg`, we end up passing it via an argument file (`rustc `@argfile`)` which delimits arguments by line break (LF or CRLF, [via](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/command-line-arguments.html#path-load-command-line-flags-from-a-path)) meaning ultimately the arguments still get split which is unfortunate. Still, I think this change is an improvement over the status quo.
I'll update the tracking issue if/once this PR merges. I'll also add the (CR)LF issue to 'unresolved question'.
r? GuillaumeGomez
r? notriddle
