rustc: Flag {i,u}128 as unsafe for FFI
These don't appear to have a stable ABI as noted in #41799 and the work in
compiler-builtins definitely seems to be confirming it!
More general `on_unimplemented`, with uses in `Try`
Allow `on_unimplemented` directives to specify both the label and the primary message of the trait error, and allow them to be controlled by flags - currently only to be desugaring-sensitive.
e.g.
```Rust
#[rustc_on_unimplemented(
on(all(direct, from_desugaring="?"),
message="the `?` operator can only be used in a \
function that returns `Result` \
(or another type that implements `{Try}`)",
label="cannot use the `?` operator in a function that returns `{Self}`"),
)]
```
r? @nikomatsakis
rustc: Remove the `used_unsafe` field on TyCtxt
Now that lint levels are available for the entire compilation, this can be an
entirely local lint in `effect.rs`
cc #44137
powerpc64: improve extern struct ABI
These fixes all have to do with the 64-bit PowerPC ELF ABI for big-endian
targets. The ELF v2 ABI for powerpc64le already worked well.
- Return after marking return aggregates indirect. Fixes#42757.
- Pass one-member float aggregates as direct argument values.
- Aggregate arguments less than 64-bit must be written in the least-
significant bits of the parameter space.
- Larger aggregates are instead padded at the tail.
(i.e. filling MSBs, padding the remaining LSBs.)
New tests were also added for the single-float aggregate, and a 3-byte
aggregate to check that it's filled into LSBs. Overall, at least these
formerly-failing tests now pass on powerpc64:
- run-make/extern-fn-struct-passing-abi
- run-make/extern-fn-with-packed-struct
- run-pass/extern-pass-TwoU16s.rs
- run-pass/extern-pass-TwoU8s.rs
- run-pass/struct-return.rs
add a lowercase suggestion to unknown_lints
I recently wrote some tests for a clippy lint, copied the (uppercase) lint name into my test file and forgot to toggle the case. This PR adds a suggestion that would have saved me 10 minutes of debugging, so it's likely a net win 🙂 . Also it adds a UI test for the `unknown_lints` lint.
These fixes all have to do with the 64-bit PowerPC ELF ABI for big-endian
targets. The ELF v2 ABI for powerpc64le already worked well.
- Return after marking return aggregates indirect. Fixes#42757.
- Pass one-member float aggregates as direct argument values.
- Aggregate arguments less than 64-bit must be written in the least-
significant bits of the parameter space.
- Larger aggregates are instead padded at the tail.
(i.e. filling MSBs, padding the remaining LSBs.)
New tests were also added for the single-float aggregate, and a 3-byte
aggregate to check that it's filled into LSBs. Overall, at least these
formerly-failing tests now pass on powerpc64:
- run-make/extern-fn-struct-passing-abi
- run-make/extern-fn-with-packed-struct
- run-pass/extern-pass-TwoU16s.rs
- run-pass/extern-pass-TwoU8s.rs
- run-pass/struct-return.rs
Forward-compatibly deny drops in constants if they *could* actually run.
This is part of #40036, specifically the checks for user-defined destructor invocations on locals which *may not* have been moved away, the motivating example being:
```rust
const FOO: i32 = (HasDrop {...}, 0).1;
```
The evaluation of constant MIR will continue to create `'static` slots for more locals than is necessary (if `Storage{Live,Dead}` statements are ignored), but it shouldn't be misusable.
r? @nikomatsakis
Initial diagnostic API for proc-macros.
This commit introduces the ability to create and emit `Diagnostic` structures from proc-macros, allowing for proc-macro authors to emit warning, error, note, and help messages just like the compiler does.
The API is somewhat based on the diagnostic API already present in `rustc` with several changes that improve usability. The entry point into the diagnostic API is a new `Diagnostic` type which is primarily created through new `error`, `warning`, `help`, and `note` methods on `Span`. The `Diagnostic` type records the diagnostic level, message, and optional `Span` for the top-level diagnostic and contains a `Vec` of all of the child diagnostics. Child diagnostics can be added through builder methods on `Diagnostic`.
A typical use of the API may look like:
```rust
let token = parse_token();
let val = parse_val();
val.span
.error(format!("expected A but found {}", val))
.span_note(token.span, "because of this token")
.help("consider using a different token")
.emit();
```
cc @jseyfried @nrc @dtolnay @alexcrichton
rustc: Fix proc_macro expansions on trait methods
This commit fixes procedural macro attributes being attached to trait methods,
ensuring that they get resolved and expanded as other procedural macro
attributes. The bug here was that `current_module` on the resolver was
accidentally set to be a trait when it's otherwise only ever expecting a
`mod`/block module. The actual fix here came from @jseyfried, I'm just helping
to land it in the compiler!
Closes#42493
Make fields of `Span` private
I actually tried to intern spans and benchmark the result<sup>*</sup>, and this was a prerequisite.
This kind of encapsulation will be a prerequisite for any other attempt to compress span's representation, so I decided to submit this change alone.
The issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43088 seems relevant, but it looks like `SpanId` won't be able to reuse this interface, unless the tables are global (like interner that I tried) and are not a part of HIR.
r? @michaelwoerister anyway
<sup>*</sup> Interning means 2-3 times more space is required for a single span, but duplicates are free. In practice it turned out that duplicates are not *that* common, so more memory was wasted by interning rather than saved.
Remove the trait selection impl in method::probe
This removes the hacky trait selection reimplementation in `method::probe`, which occasionally comes and causes problems.
There are 2 issues I've found with this approach:
1. The older implementation sometimes had a "guess" type from an impl, which allowed subtyping to work. This is why I needed to make a change in `libtest`: there's an `impl<A> Clone for fn(A)` and we're calling `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone`. The older implementation would do a subtyping between the impl type and the trait type, so it would do the check for `<fn(A) as Clone>::clone`, and confirmation would continue with the subtyping. The newer implementation directly passes `<for<'a> fn(&'a T) as Clone>::clone` to selection, which fails. I'm not sure how big of a problem that would be in reality, especially after #43690 would remove the `Clone` problem, but I still want a crater run to avoid breaking the world.
2. The older implementation "looked into" impls to display error messages. I'm not sure that's an advantage - it looked exactly 1 level deep.
r? @eddyb
Don't highlight # which does not start an attribute in rustdoc
Currently when we highlight some macros for rustdoc (e.g. `quote!` from https://github.com/dtolnay/quote), we get really bad syntax highlighting, because we assume that every token between a `#` character and the next `]` in the source must be an attribute.
This patch improves that highlighting behavior to instead only highlight after finding the `[` token after the `#` token.
(NOTE: I've only run this patch against https://github.com/nrc/rustdoc-highlight so if it doesn't build on travis that's why - I don't have a recent rustc build on this laptop)
I'm guessing r? @steveklabnik
feature error span on attribute for fn_must_use, SIMD/align reprs, macro reëxport
There were several feature-gated attributes for which the feature-not-available
error spans would point to the item annotated with the gated attribute, when it
would make more sense for the span to point to the attribute itself: if the
attribute is removed, the function/struct/_&c._ likely still makes sense and the
program will compile. (Note that we decline to make the analogous change for
the `main`, `start`, and `plugin_registrar` features, for in those cases it
makes sense for the span to implicate the entire function, of which there is
little hope of using without the gated attribute.)
