Fixes#13885.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/14007.
Problem was that I forgot to check whether or not the `span` was a
"real" one. Because if not, then it starts pointing to pretty much only
wrong content, hence the problems we saw with clippy linting on
`clippy.toml`.
changelog: Fix `literal_string_with_formatting_args` lint emitted when
it should not
r? @samueltardieu
changelog: Fix rustc_tools_util's `version.host_compiler` release
channel, expose the rustc version, and add tests.
Previously the host_compiler would be set to "nighly" on the stable
channel. Generally, the field felt a bit neglected neither being printed
not tested.
Checks for `Read::bytes()` on an unbuffered Read type.
The default implementation calls `read` for each byte, which can be very
inefficient for data that’s not in memory, such as `File`.
Considerations which I'd like to have feedback on:
* Currently this lint triggers when `.bytes()` is called on any type
that implements `std::io::Read` but not `std::io::BufRead`. This is
quite aggressive and in and may result in false positives. Alternatives:
* Only trigger on concrete types, not generic types. This does mean that
cases where a function is generic over a `R: Read` and calls `.bytes()`
are not caught by the lint, which could be quite a nasty case of this
bug.
* Only trigger on an allowlist of stdlib types
* Compromise: Is it possible to make this lint `pedantic` on types that
are not on a allowlist?
* Theoretically, a trait implementation of `Read` could override
`.bytes()` with an efficient implementation. I'm not sure how to add
this check to the lint, and I can't find any cases of this being done in
practice.
* I don't think an automatic fix for this lint is possible, but I'd love
to be proven wrong
* This is my first time contributing to clippy, please let me know if I
did anything wrong
Fixes#14087
```
changelog: [`unbuffered_bytes`]: new lint
```
By default, do not lint `.unwrap()` and `.expect(…)` in always const
contexts, as a failure would be detected at compile time anyway.
New options `allow_expect_in_consts` and `allow_unwrap_in_consts`,
defaulting to `true`, can be turned unset to still lint in always const
contexts.
Close#14198
changelog: [`unwrap_used`, `expect_used`]: add new option to lint in
always constant contexts
By default, do not lint `.unwrap()` and `.expect(…)` in always const
contexts, as a failure would be detected at compile time anyway.
New options `allow_expect_in_consts` and `allow_unwrap_in_consts`,
defaulting to `true`, can be turned unset to still lint in always const
contexts.
changelog: [`declare_interior_mutable_const`,
`borrow_interior_mutable_const`]: resolve `<T as Trait>::AssocT`
projections
---
This came up during https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130543 where
we have `<T as AtomicPrimitive>::Assoc = AtomicT` instead of just
`AtomicT` and clippy failed to resolve that properly.
This really needs a review, because
- I don't know if `try_normalize_erasing_regions` is the right thing to
call here.
- I'm not sure if I peel off the correct amount of `ValTree::Branch`
layers (I think I do).
Also, shouldn't this lint's infrastructure rely on `Freeze` trait
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121675) instead of hardcoding
a list of known-to-be-interior-mutable types?
---
Previously filed this in the main rust repo
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136369), was asked to do it here
instead
(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136369#issuecomment-2628527774).
When looking for `Default` impls that could be derived, we look at the
body of their `fn default()` and if it is an fn call or literal we check
if they are equivalent to what `#[derive(Default)]` would have used.
Now, when checking those fn calls in the `fn default()` body, we also
compare against the corresponding type's `Default::default` body to see
if our call is equivalent to that one.
For example, given
```rust
struct S;
impl S {
fn new() -> S { S }
}
impl Default for S {
fn default() -> S { S::new() }
}
```
`<S as Default>::default()` and `S::new()` are considered equivalent.
Given that, if the user also writes
```rust
struct R {
s: S,
}
impl Default for R {
fn default() -> R {
R { s: S::new() }
}
}
```
the `derivable_impls` lint will now trigger.
changelog: [`derivable_impls`]: detect when a `Default` impl is using
the same fn call that that type's `Default::default` calls
changelog: [`mem_replace_with_default`]: detect when `std::mem::replace`
is being called with the same fn that that type's `Default::default`
calls, without the need of a manually maintained list
When looking for `Default` impls that could be derived, we look at the
body of their `fn default()` and if it is an fn call or literal we check
if they are equivalent to what `#[derive(Default)]` would have used.
Now, when checking those fn calls in the `fn default()` body, we also
compare against the corresponding type's `Default::default` body to see
if our call is equivalent to that one.
For example, given
```rust
struct S;
impl S {
fn new() -> S { S }
}
impl Default for S {
fn default() -> S { S::new() }
}
```
`<S as Default>::default()` and `S::new()` are considered equivalent.
Given that, if the user also writes
```rust
struct R {
s: S,
}
impl Default for R {
fn default() -> R {
R { s: S::new() }
}
}
```
the `derivable_impls` lint will now trigger.
