check coroutines with `TypingMode::Borrowck` to avoid cyclic reasoning
MIR borrowck taints its output if an obligation fails. This could then cause `check_coroutine_obligations` to silence its error, causing us to not emit and actual error and ICE.
Fixes the ICE in https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/199. It is unfortunately still a regression.
r? compiler-errors
MIR borrowck taints its output if an obligation fails. This could then cause
`check_coroutine_obligations` to silence its error, causing us to not emit
and actual error and ICE.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #140208 (Make well-formedness predicates no longer coinductive)
- #140957 (Add `#[must_use]` to Array::map)
- #141031 (Async drop fix for dropee from another crate (#140858))
- #141036 (ci: split the dist-ohos job)
- #141051 (Remove some unnecessary erases)
- #141056 (Lowercase git url for rust-lang/enzyme.git)
- #141059 (HIR: explain in comment why `ExprKind::If` "then" is an `Expr`)
- #141070 (Do not emit help when shorthand from macro when suggest `?` or `expect`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not emit help when shorthand from macro when suggest `?` or `expect`
Fixes#140659
I didn't fully minimize the original bug, but I found a similar test case, and they have perhaps the same root cause. For the bug mentioned in #140659 , I also tested it locally and passed it.
Jieyou has worked on this part before, maybe r? `@jieyouxu`
Async drop fix for dropee from another crate (#140858)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140858.
For `AsyncDestructor` impl def id was wrongly kept as a LocalDefId, which causes crash when dropee is declared in another crate.
Also, potential problem found:
when user crate drops type with async drop in dependency crate, and user crate doesn't enable `feature(async_drop)`, then sync drop version will be used.
Is it a problem? Do we need some notification about such situations?
Make well-formedness predicates no longer coinductive
This PR makes well-formedness no longer coinductive. It was made coinductive in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98542, but AFAICT this was only to fix UI tests since we stopped lowering `where Ty:` to an empty-region outlives predicate but to a WF predicate instead.
Arguably it should lower to something completely different, something like a "type mentioned no-op predicate", but well-formedness serves this purpose fine today, and since no code (according to crater) relies on this coinductive behavior, we'd like to avoid having to emulate it in the new solver.
Fixes#123456 (I didn't want to add a test since it seems low-value to have a ICE test for a fuzzer minimization that is basically garbage code.)
Fixes#109764 (not sure if this behavior is emulatable w/o coinductive WF?)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/169
r? lcnr
Revert "Fix linking statics on Arm64EC #140176"
This reverts PR #140176.
Unfortunately, this will reopen https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138541 (re-breaking the `arm64ec-pc-windows-msvc` target).
Unfortunately, multiple people are [reporting linker warnings related to `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140176#issuecomment-2879715554) after this change in `x86_64-pc-windows-msvc` as well. The solution isn't quite clear yet, let's revert to avoid the linker warnings on the Tier 1 MSVC target for now[^timing], and try a reland with a determined solution for `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable`.
Judging from [people reporting that they are observing this also when bootstrapping w/ stage0 rustc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140176#issuecomment-2881867433), we may have to cut a new beta and then repoint stage0 against that newer beta?
cc `@dpaoliello` `@wesleywiser`
r? `@wesleywiser` (or compiler)
[^timing]: Note that it's still RustWeek this week, so most team members are N/A.
Add negative test coverage for `-Clink-self-contained` and `-Zlinker-features`
Noticed while reviewing stabilization #140525 that we don't have any negative test coverage for these flags. Feel free to cherry-pick these tests into the stabilization PR, or we can land these before separately.
r? `@lqd`
Remove manual WF hack
We do not need this hack anymore since we fixed the candidate selection problems with `Sized` bounds. We prefer built-in sized bounds now since #138176, which fixes the only regression this hack was intended to fix.
While this theoretically is broken for some code, for example, when there a param-env bound that shadows an impl or built-in trait, we don't see it in practice and IMO it's not worth the burden of having to maintain this wart in `compare_method_predicate_entailment`.
The code that regresses is, for example:
```rust
trait Bar<'a> {}
trait Foo<'a, T> {
fn method(&self)
where
Self: Bar<'a>;
}
struct W<'a, T>(&'a T)
where
Self: Bar<'a>;
impl<'a, 'b, T> Bar<'a> for W<'b, T> {}
impl<'a, 'b, T> Foo<'a, T> for W<'b, T> {
fn method(&self) {}
}
```
Specifically, I don't believe this is really going to be encountered in practice. For this to fail, there must be a where clause in the *trait method* that would shadow an impl or built-in (non-`Sized`) candidate in the trait, and this shadowing would need to be encountered when solving a nested WF goal from the impl self type.
See #108544 for the original regression. Crater run is clean!
r? lcnr
Improve `dangerous_implicit_aurorefs` diagnostic output
This PR *greatly* improves the `dangerous_implicit_aurorefs` lint diagnostic output.
Kind of related to #140721.
r? ```@jieyouxu``` (maybe)
Use the new solver in the `impossible_predicates`
The old solver is unsound for many reasons. One of which was weaponized by `@lcnr` in #140212, where the old solver was incompletely considering a dyn vtable method to be impossible and replacing its vtable entry with a null value. This null function could be called post-mono.
The new solver is expected to be less incomplete due to its correct handling of higher-ranked aliases in relate. This PR switches the `impossible_predicates` query to use the new solver, which patches this UB.
r? lcnr
Unfortunately, multiple people are reporting linker warnings related to
`__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` after this change. The solution isn't
quite clear yet, let's revert to green for now, and try a reland with a
determined solution for `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable`.
This reverts commit c8b7f32434, reversing
changes made to 667247db71.
the size of `AsyncStruct`'s destructor depends on whether the configured
panic strategy is 'unwind' or 'abort' so factor that into the test using
conditional compilation
fixesrust-lang/rust#140939
Remove mono item collection strategy override from -Zprint-mono-items
Previously `-Zprint-mono-items` would override the mono item collection
strategy. When debugging one doesn't want to change the behaviour, so
this was counter productive. Additionally, the produced behaviour was
artificial and might never arise without using the option in the first
place (`-Zprint-mono-items=eager` without `-Clink-dead-code`). Finally,
the option was incorrectly marked as `UNTRACKED`.
Resolve those issues, by turning `-Zprint-mono-items` into a boolean
flag that prints results of mono item collection without changing the
behaviour of mono item collection.
For codegen-units test incorporate `-Zprint-mono-items` flag directly
into compiletest tool.
Test changes are mechanical. `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` was removed
without additional changes, and `-Zprint-mono-items=eager` was turned
into `-Clink-dead-code`. Linking dead code disables internalization, so
tests have been updated accordingly.
Async drop fix for async_drop_in_place<T> layout for unspecified T
Fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140423.
Layout of `async_drop_in_place<T>::{closure}` is calculated for unspecified T from dataflow_const_prop `try_make_constant`.
`@oli-obk,` do you think, it may be a better solution to add check like `if !args[0].is_fully_specialized() { return None; }` in `fn async_drop_coroutine_layout`?
And could you, pls, recommend, how to implement `is_fully_specialized()` in a most simple way?
Partially stabilize LoongArch target features
Stabilization PR for the LoongArch target features. This PR stabilizes some of the target features tracked by #44839.
Specifically, this PR stabilizes the following target features:
* f
* d
* frecipe
* lasx
* lbt
* lsx
* lvz
Docs PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1707
r? `@Amanieu`
Prefer to suggest stable candidates rather than unstable ones
Fixes#140240
The logic is to replace unstable suggestions if we meet a new stable one, and do nothing if any other situation. In old logic, we just use the first candidate we meet as the suggestion for the same items.
E.g., `std::range::legacy::Range` vs `std::ops::Range`, `legacy` in the former is unstable, we prefer to suggest use the latter.
