expand: Implement something similar to `#[cfg(accessible(path))]`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64797
The feature is implemented as a `#[cfg_accessible(path)]` attribute macro rather than as `#[cfg(accessible(path))]` because it needs to wait until `path` becomes resolvable, and `cfg` cannot wait, but macros can wait.
Later we can think about desugaring or not desugaring `#[cfg(accessible(path))]` into `#[cfg_accessible(path)]`.
This implementation is also incomplete in the sense that it never returns "false" from `cfg_accessible(path)`, it requires some tweaks to resolve, which is not quite ready to answer queries like this during early resolution.
However, the most important part of this PR is not `cfg_accessible` itself, but expansion infrastructure for retrying expansions.
Before this PR we could say "we cannot resolve this macro path, let's try it later", with this PR we can say "we cannot expand this macro, let's try it later" as well.
This is a pre-requisite for
- turning `#[derive(...)]` into a regular attribute macro,
- properly supporting eager expansion for macros that cannot yet be resolved like
```
fn main() {
println!(not_available_yet!());
}
macro_rules! make_available {
() => { #[macro_export] macro_rules! not_available_yet { () => { "Hello world!" } }}
}
make_available!();
```
Implement a feature for a sound specialization subset
This implements a new feature (`min_specialization`) that restricts specialization to a subset that is reasonable for the standard library to use.
The plan is to then:
* Update `libcore` and `liballoc` to compile with `min_specialization`.
* Add a lint to forbid use of `feature(specialization)` (and other unsound, type system extending features) in the standard library.
* Fix the soundness issues around `specialization`.
* Remove `min_specialization`
The rest of this is an overview from a comment in this PR
## Basic approach
To enforce this requirement on specializations we take the following approach:
1. Match up the substs for `impl2` so that the implemented trait and self-type match those for `impl1`.
2. Check for any direct use of `'static` in the substs of `impl2`.
3. Check that all of the generic parameters of `impl1` occur at most once in the *unconstrained* substs for `impl2`. A parameter is constrained if its value is completely determined by an associated type projection predicate.
4. Check that all predicates on `impl1` also exist on `impl2` (after matching substs).
## Example
Suppose we have the following always applicable impl:
```rust
impl<T> SpecExtend<T> for std::vec::IntoIter<T> { /* specialized impl */ }
impl<T, I: Iterator<Item=T>> SpecExtend<T> for I { /* default impl */ }
```
We get that the subst for `impl2` are `[T, std::vec::IntoIter<T>]`. `T` is constrained to be `<I as Iterator>::Item`, so we check only `std::vec::IntoIter<T>` for repeated parameters, which it doesn't have. The predicates of `impl1` are only `T: Sized`, which is also a predicate of impl2`. So this specialization is sound.
## Extensions
Unfortunately not all specializations in the standard library are allowed by this. So there are two extensions to these rules that allow specializing on some traits.
### rustc_specialization_trait
If a trait is always applicable, then it's sound to specialize on it. We check trait is always applicable in the same way as impls, except that step 4 is now "all predicates on `impl1` are always applicable". We require that `specialization` or `min_specialization` is enabled to implement these traits.
### rustc_specialization_marker
There are also some specialization on traits with no methods, including the `FusedIterator` trait which is advertised as allowing optimizations. We allow marking marker traits with an unstable attribute that means we ignore them in point 3 of the checks above. This is unsound but we allow it in the short term because it can't cause use after frees with purely safe code in the same way as specializing on traits methods can.
r? @nikomatsakis
cc #31844#67194
Use `pprust` to print attributes in rustdoc
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69559.
I'm not sure what the original motivation was for the `render_attribute`, so I may be missing something, but replacing it with `pprust::attribute_to_string` seems to give the intended output (modulo some spacing idiosyncrasies).
r? @GuillaumeGomez
def_collector: Fully visit async functions
We forgot to visit attributes previously, it caused ICEs.
Special treatment of async functions is also moved from `visit_item` to `visit_fn` to reuse more of the default visitor.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67778.
Change "method" to "associated function"
r? @matthewjasper
cc @Centril @eddyb #67742
I'm opening this mostly as a test to see what the diagnostic changes would be. It seems that this makes them somewhat more verbose, and I'm not sure it's worth it...
The relevant changes are the last two commits (it is rebased on top of #67742)
Emit 1-based column numbers in debuginfo
* Use byte offsets instead of char position offsets. Resolves#67360.
* Use 1-based offsets instead of 0-based ones. Resolves#65437.
* Consistently omit column information for msvc targets, matching clang behaviour (previously columns have been omitted from `DILocation`, but not from `DILexicalBlock`).
Add `mir-opt` test for more precise drop elaboration
Depends on #69676. This test should ensure that the problem fixed in that PR does not reoccur.
This has been split out from #69676 since the test fails on certain targets where no cleanup blocks are emitted. I have to find the correct `ignore` directives.
r? @oli-obk
Don't store locals in generators that are immediately overwritten with the resume argument
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69672 and makes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69033 pass the async fn size tests again (in other words, there will be no size regression of async fn if both this and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69033 land).
~~This is a small botch and I'd rather have a more precise analysis, but that seems much harder to pull off, so this special-cases `Yield` terminators that store the resume argument into a simple local (ie. without any field projections) and explicitly marks that local as "not live" in the suspend point of that yield. We know that this local does not need to be stored in the generator for this suspend point because the next resume would immediately overwrite it with the passed-in resume argument anyways. The local might still end up in the state if it is used across another yield.~~ (this now properly updates the dataflow framework to handle this case)
Optimize catch_unwind to match C++ try/catch
This refactors the implementation of catching unwinds to allow LLVM to inline the "try" closure directly into the happy path, avoiding indirection. This means that the catch_unwind implementation is (after this PR) zero-cost unless a panic is thrown.
https://rust.godbolt.org/z/cZcUSB is an example of the current codegen in a simple case. Notably, the codegen is *exactly the same* if `-Cpanic=abort` is passed, which is clearly not great.
This PR, on the other hand, generates the following assembly:
```asm
# -Cpanic=unwind:
push rbx
mov ebx,0x2a
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c53c] # <happy>
mov eax,ebx
pop rbx
ret
mov rdi,rax
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c537] # cleanup function call
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x1c539] # <unfortunate>
mov ebx,0xd
mov eax,ebx
pop rbx
ret
# -Cpanic=abort:
push rax
call QWORD PTR [rip+0x20a1] # <happy>
mov eax,0x2a
pop rcx
ret
```
Fixes#64224, and resolves#64222.
miri engine: fix treatment of abort intrinsic
I screwed up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69830 and added `abort` to the wrong block of intrinsics, namely the one that actually has a return place. So that branch was never actually reached.
r? @oli-obk
