Add rustc_on_unimplemented for Index implementation on slice
Reopening of #31071.
It also extends the possibility of `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]` by providing a small type filter in order to find the ones which corresponds the most.
r? @pnkfelix
fix DFS for region error reporting
This was causing terrible error reports, because the algorithm was incorrectly identifying the constraints.
r? @eddyb
borrowck: do not suggest to change "&mut self" to "&mut mut self"
Matching the snippet string might not be the cleanest, but matching
the AST node instead seems to end in a lot of nested `if let`s, so I
don't know what's better.
Of course it's entirely possible that there is another API altogether
that I just don't know of?
Fixes#31424.
resolve: do not modify span of non-importable name
This span modification is probably leftover from a time when import spans were assigned differently.
With this change, error spans for the following are properly reported:
```
use abc::one_el;
use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
```
before (spans only):
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
```
after:
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~~~~~~~~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~~~~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~~
```
Fixes: #33464
This span modification is probably leftover from a time when
import spans were assigned differently.
With this change, error spans for the following are properly reported:
```
use abc::one_el;
use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
```
before (spans only):
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
(internal compiler error: unprintable span)
```
after:
```
x.rs:3 use abc::one_el;
^~~~~~~~~~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~
x.rs:4 use abc::{a, bbb, cccccc};
^~~~~~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~
x.rs:5 use a_very_long_name::{el, el2};
^~~
```
Fixes: #33464
Perform name resolution before and during ast->hir lowering
This PR performs name resolution before and during ast->hir lowering instead of in phase 3.
r? @nrc
This commit is an implementation of [RFC 1513] which allows applications to
alter the behavior of panics at compile time. A new compiler flag, `-C panic`,
is added and accepts the values `unwind` or `panic`, with the default being
`unwind`. This model affects how code is generated for the local crate, skipping
generation of landing pads with `-C panic=abort`.
[RFC 1513]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1513-less-unwinding.md
Panic implementations are then provided by crates tagged with
`#![panic_runtime]` and lazily required by crates with
`#![needs_panic_runtime]`. The panic strategy (`-C panic` value) of the panic
runtime must match the final product, and if the panic strategy is not `abort`
then the entire DAG must have the same panic strategy.
With the `-C panic=abort` strategy, users can expect a stable method to disable
generation of landing pads, improving optimization in niche scenarios,
decreasing compile time, and decreasing output binary size. With the `-C
panic=unwind` strategy users can expect the existing ability to isolate failure
in Rust code from the outside world.
Organizationally, this commit dismantles the `sys_common::unwind` module in
favor of some bits moving part of it to `libpanic_unwind` and the rest into the
`panicking` module in libstd. The custom panic runtime support is pretty similar
to the custom allocator support with the only major difference being how the
panic runtime is injected (takes the `-C panic` flag into account).
Improve diagnostics for constants being used in irrefutable patterns
It's pretty confusing and this error triggers in resolve only when "shadowing" a const, so let's make that clearer.
r? @steveklabnik
Instead of finding aux-build files in `auxiliary`, we now search for an
`aux` directory relative to the test. So if your test is
`compile-fail/foo.rs`, we would look in `compile-fail/aux`. Similarly,
we ignore the `aux` directory when searching for tets.
Short-cut `T: Sized` trait selection for ADTs
Basically avoids all nested obligations when checking whether an ADT is sized - this speeds up typeck by ~15%
The refactoring fixed#32963, but I also want to make `Copy` not object-safe (will commit that soon).
Fixes#33201
r? @nikomatsakis
This requirement appears to be missing from RFC1214, but is clearly
necessary for translation. The last field of a tuple/enum remains in
a state of limbo, compiling but causing an ICE when it is used - we
should eventually fix that somehow.
this is a [breaking-change] - a soundness fix - and requires a
crater run.
resolve: print location of static for "static in pattern" error
The implementation mirrors the one for "constant defined here" annotation used for constant patterns in the irrefutable-pattern case.
Fixes: #23716
fix various const eval errors
These were found after const_evaluating arbitrary expressions and linting if the const evaluator failed
fixes#33275 (int -> float casts for negative ints)
fixes#33291 (int -> char casts (new! wasn't allowed in constants until this PR))
r? @eddyb
cc @bluss @japaric
typeck: remove confusing suggestion for calling a fn type
* It is not clear what a "base function" is.
* The suggestion just adds parens, so suggests calling without args.
The second point could be fixed with e.g. `(...)` instead of `()`,
but the preceding "note: X is a function, perhaps you wish to call it"
should already be clear enough.
Fixes: #31341
match check: note "catchall" patterns in unreachable error
Caught as catchall patterns are:
* unconditional name bindings
* references to them
* tuple bindings with catchall elements
Fixes#31221.
resolve: improve diagnostics and lay groundwork for resolving before ast->hir
This PR improves diagnostics in `resolve` and lays some groundwork for resolving before ast->hir.
More specifically,
- It removes an API in `resolve` intended for external refactoring tools (see #27493) that appears not to be in active use. The API is incompatible with resolving before ast->hir, but could be rewritten in a more compatible and less intrusive way.
- It improves the diagnostics for pattern bindings that conflict with `const`s.
- It improves the diagnostics for modules used as expressions (fixes#33186).
- It refactors away some uses of the hir map, which is unavavailable before ast->hir lowering.
r? @eddyb
* It is not clear what a "base function" is.
* The suggestion just adds parens, so suggests calling without args.
The second point could be fixed with e.g. `(...)` instead of `()`,
but the preceding "note: X is a function, perhaps you wish to call it"
should already be clear enough.
Fixes: #31341
