ensure failing promoteds in const/static bodies are handled correctly
`const`/`static` bodies are the one case where we still promote code that might fail to evaluate. Ensure that this is handled correctly; in particular, it must not fail compilation.
`src/test/ui/consts/const-eval/erroneous-const.rs` ensures that when a non-promoted fails to evaluate, we *do* show an error.
r? `@oli-obk`
Make unchecked_{add,sub,mul} inherent methods unstably const
The intrinsics are marked as being stably const (even though they're not stable by nature of being intrinsics), but the currently-unstable inherent versions are not marked as const. This fixes this inconsistency. Split out of #85017,
r? `@oli-obk`
Fix suggestions for missing return type lifetime specifiers
This pull request aims to fix#84592. The issue is that the current code seems to assume that there is only a single relevant span pointing to the missing lifetime, and only looks at the first one:
e5f83d24ae/compiler/rustc_resolve/src/late/lifetimes.rs (L2959)
This is incorrect, though, and leads to incorrect error messages and invalid suggestions. For instance, the example from #84592:
```rust
struct TwoLifetimes<'x, 'y> {
x: &'x (),
y: &'y (),
}
fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
TwoLifetimes { x: &(), y: &() }
}
```
currently leads to:
```
error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifiers
--> src/main.rs:6:57
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
| --- --- ^^ expected 2 lifetime parameters
|
= help: this function's return type contains a borrowed value, but the signature does not say whether it is borrowed from `a` or `b`
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed<'a>(a: &'a (), b: &'a ()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_<'a, 'a>, '_> {
| ^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^
```
There are two problems:
- The error message is wrong. There is only _one_ lifetime parameter expected at the location pointed to by the error message (and another one at a separate location).
- The suggestion is incorrect and will not lead to correct code.
With the changes in this PR, I get the following output:
```
error[E0106]: missing lifetime specifiers
--> p.rs:6:57
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed(a: &(), b: &()) -> TwoLifetimes<'_, '_> {
| --- --- ^^ ^^ expected named lifetime parameter
| |
| expected named lifetime parameter
|
= help: this function's return type contains a borrowed value, but the signature does not say whether it is borrowed from `a` or `b`
help: consider introducing a named lifetime parameter
|
6 | fn two_lifetimes_needed<'a>(a: &'a (), b: &'a ()) -> TwoLifetimes<'a, 'a> {
| ^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ ^^ ^^
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0106`.
```
Mainly, I changed `add_missing_lifetime_specifiers_label()` to receive a _vector_ of spans (and counts) instead of just one, and adjusted its body accordingly.
rustc_session: Move more option building code from the `options!` macro
The moved code doesn't need to be generated by a macro, it can use a regular (generic) function and type aliases instead.
(The refactoring is salvaged from a branch with different now abandoned work.)
Add primary marker on codegen unit and generate main wrapper on primary codegen.
This is the codegen part of changes extracted from #84062.
This add a marker called `primary` on each codegen units, where exactly one codegen unit will be `primary = true` at a time. This specific codegen unit will take charge of generating `main` wrapper when `main` is imported from a foreign crate after the implementation of RFC 1260.
cc #28937
I'm not sure who should i ask for review for codegen changes, so feel free to reassign.
r? `@nagisa`
Improve support for NewPM
This adds various missing bits of support for NewPM and allows us to successfully run stage 2 tests with NewPM enabled.
This does not yet enable NewPM by default, as there are still known issue on LLVM 12 (such as a weak fat LTO pipeline). The plan is to make the switch after we update to LLVM 13.
Remove `FakeDefId::expect_local()`
This function returned a fake `DefIndex`, with no indication that it was
fake, when it was provided with a `FakeDefId::Fake`. Every use of the
function uses the returned `DefIndex` in a call to
`tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id()`, which I'm pretty sure would panic if it
were given a fake `DefIndex`.
I removed the function and replaced all calls to it with a call to
`expect_real()` followed by `DefId::expect_local()` (that's a function
on the *real* `DefId`).
Now, in the case that the function is not inlined, the panic location
will be the caller's location, which is more helpful since the panic is
not `expect_real()`'s fault.
This function returned a fake `DefIndex`, with no indication that it was
fake, when it was provided with a `FakeDefId::Fake`. Every use of the
function uses the returned `DefIndex` in a call to
`tcx.local_def_id_to_hir_id()`, which I'm pretty sure would panic if it
were given a fake `DefIndex`.
I removed the function and replaced all calls to it with a call to
`expect_real()` followed by `DefId::expect_local()` (that's a function
on the *real* `DefId`).
Bump stdarch submodule
Major changes:
- More AVX-512 intrinsics.
- More ARM & AArch64 NEON intrinsics.
- Updated unstable WASM intrinsics to latest draft standards.
- Intrinsics that previously used `#[rustc_args_required_const]` now use const generics. See #83167 for more details.
- `std_detect` is now a separate crate instead of a submodule of `std`.
This causes an assertion failure under NewPM, because it also ends
up disabling the NameAnonGlobals pass.
Instead pass -Copt-level=0 to disable optimizations. If that should
be insufficient, we can use -C no-prepopulate-passes.
Update cargo
7 commits in f3e13226d6d17a2bc5f325303494b43a45f53b7f..e51522ab3db23b0d8f1de54eb1f0113924896331
2021-04-30 21:50:27 +0000 to 2021-05-07 21:29:52 +0000
- Add CARGO_TARGET_TMPDIR env var for integration tests & benches (rust-lang/cargo#9375)
- Bump to 0.55.0, update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#9464)
- Some updates to the unstable documentation (rust-lang/cargo#9457)
- Add CARGO_PROFILE_<name>_SPLIT_DEBUGINFO to env docs. (rust-lang/cargo#9456)
- Add `report` subcommand. (rust-lang/cargo#9438)
- Respect Cargo.toml `[package.exclude]` even not in a git repo. (rust-lang/cargo#9186)
- Document the other crates in the codebase in the contrib guide. (rust-lang/cargo#9439)
rustdoc: Link to the docs on namespaces when an unknown disambiguator is found
This was reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84950; this re-lands the changes, but without different behavior depending on the channel.
r? `@camelid` cc `@pietroalbini`
Don't stop running rustdoc-gui tests at first failure
I just realized that before this PR, the rustdoc-gui test suite was stopping at the first failure, which isn't very convenient. All tests are now running and if one failed, it returns an error at the end once all tests have run.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Improve diagnostics for functions in `struct` definitions
Tries to implement #76421.
This is probably going to need unit tests, but I wanted to hear from review all the cases tests should cover.
I'd like to follow up with the "mechanically applicable suggestion here that adds an impl block" step, but I'd need guidance. My idea for now would be to try to parse a function, and if that succeeds, create a dummy `ast::Item` impl block to then format it using `pprust`. Would that be a viable approach? Is there a better alternative?
r? `@matklad` cc `@estebank`
