lib: more eagerly return `self.len()` from `ceil_char_boundary`
There is no reason to go through the complicated branch as it would
always return `self.len()` in this case. Also helps debug code somewhat
and I guess might make optimizations easier (although I haven't really a
sample to demonstrate this.)
ref. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93743
Suggested by `@chrisduerr`
compiler: rename BareFn to FnPtr
At some point "BareFn" was the chosen name for a "bare" function, without the niceties of `~fn`, `&fn`, or a few other ways of writing a function type. However, at some point the syntax for a "bare function" and any other function diverged even more. We started calling them what they are: function pointers, denoted by their own syntax.
However, we never changed the *internal* name for these, as this divergence was very gradual. Personally, I have repeatedly searched for "FnPtr" and gotten confused until I find the name is BareFn, only to forget this until the next time, since I don't routinely interact with the higher-level AST and HIR. But even tools that interact with these internal types only touch on them in a few places, making a migration easy enough. Let's use a more intuitive and obvious name, as this 12+ year old name has little to do with current Rust.
Renamed retain_mut to retain on LinkedList as mentioned in the ACP
This is for proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/250
The original check-in (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114136) contained both methods **retain** and **retain_mut**, which does not conform to https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/250#issuecomment-1766822671.
I updated the retain documentation to specify **&mut e**, removed the **retain** method and renamed **retain_mut** to **retain** to conform to the request.
The pull request doesn't really contain much that is new, just removes the unwanted method to meet the requirements.
I've run the tests "library/alloc" on the code and no issues.
Hopefully I'm not stepping on the original author's toes. I just ran across a need for the method and wondered why it was unstable.
mbe: Change `unused_macro_rules` to a `DenseBitSet`
Now that it only contains indexes, and no other information, a bitset provides a more compact and simpler representation.
This builds on <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143416>. Only the last commit is new.
Align attr fixes
- Remove references to the superseded `repr(align)` syntax
- Allow the attribute on fn items in `extern` blocks
- Test attribute in combination with `async fn` and `dyn`
r? workingjubilee
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
`@rustbot` label A-attributes F-fn_align T-compiler
There is no reason to go through the complicated branch as it would
always return `self.len()` in this case. Also helps debug code somewhat
and I guess might make optimizations easier (although I haven't really a
sample to demonstrate this.)
ref. #93743
Suggested by @chrisduerr
Fix some comments and related types and locals where it is obvious, e.g.
- bare_fn -> fn_ptr
- LifetimeBinderKind::BareFnType -> LifetimeBinderKind::FnPtrType
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <me@fmease.dev>
Do not unify borrowed locals in CopyProp.
Instead of trying yet another scheme to unify borrowed locals in CopyProp, let's just stop trying. We had already enough miscompilations because of this.
I'm convinced it's possible to have both unification of some borrowed locals and soundness, but I don't have a simple and convincing formulation yet.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143491
The clock_nanosleep support is there to allow code using `sleep_until`
to run under Miri. Therefore the implementation is minimal.
- Only the clocks REALTIME and MONOTONIC are supported. The first is supported simply
because it was trivial to add not because it was needed for sleep_until.
- The only supported flag combinations are no flags or TIMER_ABSTIME only.
If an unsupported flag combination or clock is passed in this throws
unsupported.
Using clock nanosleep leads to more accurate sleep times on platforms
where it is supported.
To enable using clock_nanosleep this makes `sleep_until` platform
specific. That unfortunatly requires identical placeholder
implementations for the other platforms (windows/mac/wasm etc).
we will land platform specific implementations for those later. See the
`sleep_until` tracking issue.
This requires an accessors for the Instant type. As that accessor is only
used on the platforms that have clock_nanosleep it is marked as allow_unused.
32bit time_t targets do not use clock_nanosleep atm, they instead rely
on the same placeholder as the other platforms. We could make them
use clock_nanosleep too in the future using `__clock_nanosleep_time64`.
__clock_nanosleep_time64 is documented at:
https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/64_002dbit-time-symbol-handling.html
