Enable Non-determinism of float operations in Miri and change std tests
Links to [#4208](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4208) and [#3555](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3555) in Miri.
Non-determinism of floating point operations was disabled in rust-lang/rust#137594 because it breaks the tests and doc-tests in core/coretests and std. This PR enables some of them.
This pr includes the following changes:
- Enables the float non-determinism but with a lower relative error of 4ULP instead of 16ULP
- These operations now have a fixed output based on the C23 standard, except the pow operations, this is tracked in [#4286](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4286#issue-3010677983)
- Changes tests that made incorrect assumptions about the operations, not to make that assumption anymore (from `assert_eq!` to `assert_approx_eq!`.
- Changed the doctests of the stdlib of these operations to compare against fixed constants instead of `f*::EPSILON`, which now succeed with Miri and `-Zmiri-many-seeds`
- Added a constant `APPROX_DELTA` in `std/tests/floats/f32.rs` which is used for approximation tests, but with a different value when run in Miri. This is to make these tests succeed.
- Added tests in the float tests of Miri to test the C23 behaviour.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/4208
Stabilize `sha512`, `sm3` and `sm4` for x86
This PR stabilizes the feature flag `sha512_sm_x86` (tracking issue rust-lang/rust#126624).
# Public API
The 3 `x86` target features `sha512`, `sm3` and `sm4`, and the associated intrinsics in stdarch.
These target features are very specialized, and are only used to signal the presence of the corresponding CPU instruction. They don't have any nontrivial interaction with the ABI (contrary to something like AVX), and serve the only purpose of enabling 10 stdarch intrinsics, all of which have been implemented and propagated to rustc via a stdarch submodule update.
Also, these were added in LLVM17, and as the minimum LLVM required for rustc is LLVM19, we are safe in that front too!
# Associated PRs
- rust-lang/rust#126704
- rust-lang/stdarch#1592
- rust-lang/stdarch#1790
- rust-lang/rust#140389 (stdarch submodule update)
- rust-lang/stdarch#1796 (stabilizing the runtime detection and intrinsics)
- rust-lang/rust#141964 (stdarch submodule update for the stabilization of the runtime detection and intrinsics)
As all of the required tasks have been done (adding the target features to rustc, implementing their runtime detection in std_detect and implementing the associated intrinsics in core_arch), these target features can be stabilized now.
cc `@rust-lang/lang`
cc `@rust-lang/libs-api` for the intrinsics and runtime detection
I don't think anyone else worked on this feature, so no one else to ping, maybe cc `@Amanieu.` I will send the reference pr soon.
add `Cargo.lock` to CI-rustc allowed list for non-CI env
Changes to dependencies usually require modifying `Cargo.toml`, which would already invalidate the CI-rustc cache if done in non-allowed paths. On non-CI environment, it should be safe to add `Cargo.lock` to the list of allowed paths as there is no real risk aside from a very rare false positive in cases like minor bumps to non-allowed path dependencies without modifying the `Cargo.toml` files.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141986
Run `calculate_matrix` job on `master` to cache citool builds
As discussed in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/242791-t-infra/topic/PR.20ci.20seems.20much.20to.20slow/with/523028903, the current `rust-cache` solution for `citool` doesn't work, because we don't ever write to the cache from `master`, so the cache is empty on PR CI jobs.
This PR runs the `calculate_matrix` job on `master`, with the only motivation to actually prime the cache.
r? `@marcoieni`
Dont make `ObligationCtxt`s with diagnostics unnecessarily
just a nit, shouldn't affect perf b/c `ObligationCtxt::new_with_diagnostics` should only be more expensive in the new trait solver, and I don't expect either of these to encounter errors today anyways.
r? oli-obk
add tests for pattern binding drop order edge cases
This adds tests for rust-lang/rust#142163, rust-lang/rust#142057, and rust-lang/rust#142056. I'm using these tests to help make sure I don't commit breaking changes when implementing match lowering for guard patterns, but I think it makes sense to add them separately. They don't directly have anything to do with guard patterns.
r? `@Nadrieril` or reassign
De-duplicate f16 & f128 doctest attributes
Now that rustdoc supports `#[doc(test(attr(...)))]` at every level, thanks to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140560, we can de-duplicate the f16 & f128 doctest attributes.
Unfortunately we can de-duplicate the `cfg`s attribute as rustdoc would complain about missing `main`, but it's already much better than before.
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140323/files#r2062702761
r? `@tgross35`
Stabilize `tcp_quickack`
to stabilise the quickack part for now, tcp_deferaccept had been added at a later stage.
The related API calls are the following
```rust
// std::os::linux::net
// sealed trait, implemented for std::net::TcpStream
pub trait TcpStreamExt: Sealed{
fn quickack(&self) -> io::Result<bool>;
fn set_quickack(&self, quickack: bool) -> io::Result<()>;
}
```
Closes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96256
Avoid a gratuitous 10s wait in a stress test
`stress_recv_timeout_two_threads`, in the mpmc and mpsc testsuites, is a stress test of the `recv_timeout` function. This test processes and ignores timeouts, and just ensures that every sent value gets received. As such, the exact length of the timeouts is not critical, only that the timeout and sleep durations ensure that at least one timeout occurred.
The current tests have 100 iterations, half of which sleep for 200ms, causing the test to take 10s. This represents around 2/3rds of the *total* runtime of the `library/std` testsuite, and is the only standard library test that takes more than a second.
Reduce this to 50 iterations where half of them sleep for 10ms, causing the test to take 0.25s.
Add a check that at least one timeout occurred.
CI: rfl: move job forward to Linux v6.16-rc1
Another hopefully routine upgrade to Linux v6.16-rc1, just released.
r? `@lqd` `@Kobzol`
try-job: x86_64-rust-for-linux
`@rustbot` label A-rust-for-linux
`@bors` try
Do not checkout GCC submodule for the tidy job
This is not a fully general solution, but the GCC submodule checkout is so slow that I think it's worth it to special-case it. This brings down the time required to checkout submodules from ~1.5 minute to ~0.5 minute.
Remap compiler vs non-compiler sources differently (bootstrap side)
See [#t-compiler/help > Span pointing to wrong file location (`rustc-dev` component)](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Span.20pointing.20to.20wrong.20file.20location.20.28.60rustc-dev.60.20component.29/with/521087083).
The path remapping and unremapping for compiler sources (distributed via `rustc-dev` dist component) is broken because bootstrap currently remaps all sources unconditionally (if remapping is enabled) to the `/rustc/{hash}` form. However, the `rustc-dev` dist component (compiler sources) and `rust-src` dist component (library sources) unpacks differently:
- `rust-src` unpacks sources to a path like `$sysroot/lib/rustlib/src/rust`, whereas
- `rustc-dev` unpacks sources to a path like `$sysroot/lib/rustlib/rustc-src/rust`[^note],
meaning that the compiler need to unremap them differently. But the same remapping means that the compiler has no way to distinguish between compiler and non-compiler (esp. standard library) sources. To remedy this, this PR adopts the approach of:
- remapping compiler sources (corresponding to `rustc-dev` dist component) with `/rustc-dev/{hash}` (this is `RemapScheme::Compiler`), and
- remapping non-compiler sources (corresponding to `rust-src` dist component or other non-compiler sources) with `/rustc/{hash}` (this is `RemapScheme::NonCompiler`).
A different remapping allows the compiler to reverse the remapping differently.
This PR implements the bootstrap side. A follow-up compiler-side change is needed to implement the unremapping change to address the reported issue completely.
This PR introduces another env var `CFG_VIRTUAL_RUSTC_DEV_SOURCE_BASE_DIR` that is made available to the compiler when building compiler sources to know what the remap scheme for `rustc-dev` (`RemapScheme::Compiler`) is. Compiler sources are built with the compiler remapping scheme.
As far as I know, this change should not introduce new regressions, because the compiler source unremapping (through `rustc-dev`) is already broken.
[^note]: (Notice the `src` vs `rustc-src` difference.)
Add (back) `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint to reject more invalid calling conventions
This adds back the `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint that was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129935, in order to start the process of dealing with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137018. Specifically, we are going for the plan laid out [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137018#issuecomment-2672118326):
- thiscall, stdcall, fastcall, cdecl should only be accepted on x86-32
- vectorcall should only be accepted on x86-32 and x86-64
The difference to the status quo is that:
- We stop accepting stdcall, fastcall on targets that are windows && non-x86-32 (we already don't accept these on targets that are non-windows && non-x86-32)
- We stop accepting cdecl on targets that are non-x86-32
- (There is no difference for thiscall, this was already a hard error on non-x86-32)
- We stop accepting vectorcall on targets that are windows && non-x86-*
Vectorcall is an unstable ABI so we can just make this a hard error immediately. The others are stable, so we emit the `unsupported_calling_conventions` forward-compat lint. I set up the lint to show up in dependencies via cargo's future-compat report immediately, but we could also make it show up just for the local crate first if that is preferred.
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: test-various
